首页> 外文期刊>BioMed research international >Prospective Analysis of18F-FDG PET/CT Predictive Value in Patients with Low Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Conservative Surgery
【24h】

Prospective Analysis of18F-FDG PET/CT Predictive Value in Patients with Low Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Conservative Surgery

机译:新辅助放化疗和保守手术治疗低位直肠癌患者18F-FDG PET / CT预测价值的前瞻性分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study prospectively assessed18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting the response of locally advanced low rectal cancer (LRC) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT).Methods. 56 patients treated with chemoradiation underwent two18F-FDG PET/CT scans (baseline and 5-6 weeks post-nCRT).18F-FDG uptake (SUVmax and SUVmean) and differences between baseline (SUV1) and post-nCRT (SUV2) scans (ΔSUV and RI%) were evaluated. Results were related to the Mandard’s TRG and (y)pTNM.Results.18F-FDG PET/CT sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV resulted in 88.6%, 66.7%, 83.92%, 90.7%, and 61.5%. SUV2 resulted in better than SUV1 to predict nCRT response by TRG, with no significant statistical difference between the SUVmax2 and SUVmean2 AUC (0.737 versus 0.736;P=0.928). The same applies to the (y)pTNM (0.798 versus 0.782;P=0.192). In relation to the TRG, RI values had a higher AUC than ΔSUV, with no significant difference between RImax and RImean (0.672 versus 0.695;P=0.292). The same applied to the (y)pTNM (0.742 versus 0.741;P=0.940). In both cases ΔSUV does not appear to be a good predictive tool. Logistic regression confirmed the better predictive role of SUVmax2 for the (y)pTNM (odds ratio = 1.58) and SUVmean2 for the TRG (odds ratio = 1.87).Conclusions.18F-FDG PET/CT can evaluate response to nCRT in LRC, even if more studies are required to define the most significant parameter for predicting pathologic tumor changes.
机译:这项研究前瞻性地评估了18F-FDG PET / CT在预测局部晚期低位直肠癌(LRC)对新辅助化学放疗(nCRT)的反应中。对56例接受化学放射治疗的患者进行了两次18F-FDG PET / CT扫描(基线和nCRT后5-6周).18F-FDG摄取(SUVmax和SUVmean)以及基线(SUV1)和nCRT后(SUV2)扫描之间的差异(评价了ΔSUV和RI%。结果与Mandard的TRG和(y)pTNM有关。结果。18F-FDG PET / CT的敏感性,特异性,准确性,PPV和NPV分别为88.6%,66.7%,83.92%,90.7%和61.5%。 SUV2通过TRG预测nCRT反应的结果优于SUV1,SUVmax2和SUVmean2 AUC之间的统计差异无统计学意义(0.737对0.736; P = 0.928)。 (y)pTNM也是如此(0.798对0.782; P = 0.192)。关于TRG,RI值的AUC高于ΔSUV,RImax和RImean之间无显着差异(0.672对0.695; P = 0.292)。 (y)pTNM也是如此(0.742对0.741; P = 0.940)。在这两种情况下,ΔSUV似乎都不是一个好的预测工具。 Logistic回归证实SUVmax2对(y)pTNM(奇数比= 1.58)和SUVmean2对TRG(奇数比= 1.87)具有更好的预测作用。结论。18F-FDG PET / CT可以评估LRC中对nCRT的反应,甚至如果需要进行更多研究以定义预测病理性肿瘤变化的最重要参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号