首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Literature and Science >Martin Willis, Keir Waddington & James Castell, “ScienceHumanities: Theory, Politics, Practice.”
【24h】

Martin Willis, Keir Waddington & James Castell, “ScienceHumanities: Theory, Politics, Practice.”

机译:Martin Willis,Keir Waddington和James Castell,“科学人文科学:理论,政治,实践”。

获取原文
       

摘要

In January 2015, Nature offered an editorial on the relationship between the sciences,the social sciences and the humanities (Campbell and Dhand). Perhaps with a desire tobegin a new calendar year with a fresh and urgent perspective, the editorial argued that“Governments that want the natural sciences to deliver more for society need to showgreater commitment towards the social sciences and humanities” (5). It went on tosuggest that present systems and policies – of funding and strategic support, bothinstitutionally and governmentally – may destabilise the potential for the differentdisciplines to work together. Despite this, the editorial concluded that there is a widelyheldview, even within these institutions and relevant funding bodies, that “the mutualframing of challenges is the surest way to overcome the conceptual diversities and gulfsthat can make such collaborations a challenge” (5). There are two sets of challenges tobe addressed in other words: the challenges themselves and the challenge of the newmodes of collaboration necessary to address them. Too often, as we suggest here, thesechallenges solidify disciplinary boundaries rather than enabling new ways of workingtogether.
机译:2015年1月,《自然》杂志发表了一篇有关科学,社会科学与人文科学之间关系的社论(坎贝尔和丹德)。社论可能希望以崭新而迫切的眼光开始一个新的日历年,认为“希望自然科学为社会提供更多成果的政府需要表现出对社会科学和人文科学的更大承诺”(5)。它建议,目前的系统和政策-机构和政府的资金和战略支持-可能会破坏不同学科合作的潜力。尽管如此,社论的结论是,即使在这些机构和相关供资机构内部,也存在着广泛的观点,即“挑战的相互框架是克服可能使这种合作成为挑战的概念多样性和鸿沟的最可靠方法”(5)。换句话说,有两类挑战要解决:挑战本身以及应对这些挑战所必需的新协作模式的挑战。正如我们在这里建议的那样,挑战常常巩固了学科界限,而不是实现新的合作方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号