首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >The sustained influence of prior experience induced by social observation on placebo and nocebo responses
【24h】

The sustained influence of prior experience induced by social observation on placebo and nocebo responses

机译:社会观察引发的先前经验对安慰剂和Nocebo反应的持续影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Social observation is one of the main ways to gain experience. Similar to first-person experience, observational experience affects the effectiveness of subsequent treatments. Yet, it is still undetermined whether the influence of social observation on placebo and nocebo effects to subsequent treatments remains even if related experience occurred a few days ago. Methods: Eighty-two participants were recruited and each of them was randomly assigned to one of the four experimental groups acquiring first-person or observational experience, which was either effective or ineffective. For the first-person groups, participants were presented with pain cues paired with pain stimuli in person. In the effective condition, low pain cues were paired with low pain stimuli, and high pain cues were paired with high pain stimuli. In contrast, the associations between cues and pain stimuli were not established in the ineffective condition. Similarly, for the observational groups, participants received effective/ineffective treatment through observation. Five or six days later, all participants underwent a conditioning phase followed by a test phase composed of two tests, where participants were asked to report their perceived pain. Results: Placebo and nocebo responses to subsequent treatments can be affected by prior experience gained several days ago regardless of acquisition ways, and both placebo and nocebo responses in the effective condition were significantly larger than those in the ineffective condition. Furthermore, once placebo and nocebo effects were elicited, the latter was more persistent, while the former was more likely to diminish. Conclusion: First-person and observational experience obtained a few days ago could affect the following treatments, which advance our understanding of the crucial and sustained influence of social observation on placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia, and provide insights into clinical applications.
机译:背景:社会观察是获得经验的主要途径之一。类似于第一人称体验,观察经历会影响后续治疗的有效性。然而,即使几天前发生了相关经验,社会观察对安慰剂和诺西博作用对后续治疗的影响是否仍然存在尚不确定。方法:招募了八十二名参与者,将他们各自随机分配到四个获得第一人称或观察经验的实验组之一,该实验组有效或无效。对于第一人称组,向参与者展示了疼痛提示和亲自进行的疼痛刺激。在有效情况下,将低痛提示与低痛刺激配对,将高痛提示与高痛刺激配对。相反,提示和疼痛刺激之间的关联在无效条件下并未建立。同样,对于观察组,参与者通过观察获得了有效/无效的治疗。五六天后,所有参与者都经历了适应期,随后是由两个测试组成的测试阶段,要求参与者报告他们的感觉到的疼痛。结果:几天前获得的经验可能会影响安慰剂和nocebo对后续治疗的反应,而无论获得方式如何,有效条件下的安慰剂和nocebo反应均显着大于无效条件下的反应。此外,一旦引起安慰剂和Nocebo的作用,后者会更持久,而前者更可能减少。结论:几天前获得的第一人称和观察经验可能会影响以下治疗,从而使我们进一步了解社会观察对安慰剂镇痛和Nocebo痛觉过敏的关键和持续影响,并为临床应用提供见识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号