首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >A 9-year follow-up of a self-management group intervention for persistent neck pain in primary health care: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

A 9-year follow-up of a self-management group intervention for persistent neck pain in primary health care: a randomized controlled trial

机译:自我管理小组干预对初级保健中持续性颈痛的9年随访:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and objective: In previous short-term and 2-year follow-ups, a pain and stress self-management group intervention (PASS) had better effect on pain-related disability, self-efficacy, catastrophizing, and perceived pain control than individually administered physiotherapy (IAPT) for patients with persistent tension-type neck pain. Studies that have evaluated long-term effects of self-management approaches toward persistent neck pain are sparse. The objective of this study was to compare pain-related disability, self-efficacy for activities of daily living (ADL), catastrophizing, pain, pain control, use of analgesics, and health care utilization in people with persistent tension-type neck pain 9 years after they received the PASS or IAPT. Materials and methods: Of 156 people (PASS, n = 77; IAPT, n = 79) originally included?in a randomized controlled trial, 129 people (PASS, n = 63; IAPT, n = 66) were eligible and were approached for the 9-year follow-up. They were sent a self-assessment questionnaire, comprising the Neck Disability Index, the Self-Efficacy Scale, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire, and questions regarding pain, analgesics, and health care utilization. Mixed linear models for repeated measures analysis or generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the differences between groups and within groups over time (baseline, previous follow-ups, and 9-year follow-up) and the interaction effect of “time by group”. Results: Ninety-four participants (73%) responded (PASS, n = 48; IAPT, n = 46). At 9 years, PASS participants reported less pain-related disability, pain at worst, and analgesics usage, and a trend toward better self-efficacy compared to IAPT participants. There was a difference between groups in terms of change over time for disability, self-efficacy for ADL, catastrophizing, perceived pain control, and health care visits in favor of PASS. Analyses of simple main effects at?9 years showed that the PASS group had less disability ( p = 0.006) and a trend toward better self-efficacy ( p = 0.059) than the IAPT group. Conclusion: The favorable effects on pain-related disability of PASS were sustained 9 years after the intervention.
机译:背景和目的:在先前的短期和两年随访中,疼痛和压力自我管理小组干预(PASS)对疼痛相关的残疾,自我效能,灾难性和可感知的疼痛控制的效果要优于单独的效果对患有持续性紧张型颈部疼痛的患者进行理疗(IAPT)。评估自我管理方法对持续性颈部疼痛的长期影响的研究很少。这项研究的目的是比较持续性紧张型颈痛患者的疼痛相关残疾,日常生活活动自我效能(ADL),灾难性,疼痛,疼痛控制,镇痛药的使用以及医疗保健的利用9他们收到PASS或IAPT后的数年。资料和方法:最初纳入随机对照试验的156人(PASS,n = 77; IAPT,n = 79)中,有129人(PASS,n = 63; IAPT,n = 66)符合条件并接受了治疗。 9年的随访。向他们发送了自我评估问卷,包括颈部残疾指数,自我效能量表,应对策略问卷以及有关疼痛,止痛药和医疗保健利用的问题。使用混合线性模型进行重复测量分析或广义估计方程,以评估组之间以及组内随时间推移的差异(基线,先前的随访和9年随访)以及“按时间分组”的交互作用。结果:94位参与者(73%)回答了(PASS,n = 48; IAPT,n = 46)。与IAPT参与者相比,在9岁时,PASS参与者报告的与疼痛相关的残疾,最坏的疼痛和止痛药的使用较少,并且自我效能有提高的趋势。两组之间在随时间变化的残疾,对ADL的自我效能,灾难性,可感知的疼痛控制以及支持PASS的医疗保健方面存在差异。对9年时的简单主要影响进行的分析表明,与IAPT组相比,PASS组的残疾程度更低(p = 0.006),并且具有更好的自我效能的趋势(p = 0.059)。结论:干预后9年,对PASS疼痛相关残疾的良好效果得以持续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号