首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research >Central and Peripheral Corneal Thickness Measurement in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes Using Three Corneal Pachymeters
【24h】

Central and Peripheral Corneal Thickness Measurement in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes Using Three Corneal Pachymeters

机译:使用三个角膜测厚仪测量正常和角膜曲张眼的中央和周围角膜厚度

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To assess the agreement among ultrasonic pachymetry, the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer, and Orbscan II for central and peripheral (Galilei vs. Orbscan) corneal thickness (CCT and PCT) measurement in normal and keratoconic eyes. Methods: In this prospective study, CCT and PCT were measured in 88 eyes of 88 refractive surgery candidates and 128 eyes of 69 keratoconic patients with ultrasonic pachymetry, the Galilei, and Orbscan II. The readings by the three instruments were compared using one-way analysis of normal variance. Agreement among the three devices was assessed using Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots. The same analyses were employed to evaluate agreement between Galilei and Orbscan II for PCT measurement. Results: In the normal group, mean CCT was 551.0±39.4, 566.9±33.5, and 565.5±40.9 μm measured by ultrasonic pachymetry, the Galilei, and Orbscan II, respectively (P<0.001). The corresponding figures in the keratoconus group were 492.0±61.7, 502.0±42.1, and 470.6±56.9 μm, respectively (P<0.001). Mean PCT was 612.5±35.3 and 640.9±38.0 μm in the normal group (P<0.001) and 567.6±35.2 and 595.1±41.4 μm in the keratoconus group (P<0.001) by the Galilei and Orbscan II, respectively. CCT and PCT measurements obtained by different devices were significantly correlated in both groups. Conclusion: To measure CCT, the Galilei and Orbscan II can be used interchangeably in normal eyes, but not in keratoconic eyes. For PCT, there is a systematic error between measurements obtained by the Galilei and Orbscan II. However, it is possible to change optical pachymeter readings into those obtained by ultrasonic pachymetry using a constant.
机译:目的:为了评估超声测厚仪,Galilei双Scheimpflug分析仪和Orbscan II在正常和圆锥角膜眼睛中央和周边(伽利略与Orbscan)角膜厚度(CCT和PCT)测量之间的一致性。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,采用超声测厚法,Galilei和Orbscan II对88例屈光手术候选人的88眼和69例圆锥角膜患者的128眼进行了CCT和PCT测量。使用单向正态方差分析比较了三种仪器的读数。使用Pearson和组内相关系数以及Bland-Altman图评估了三种设备之间的一致性。使用相同的分析来评估Galilei和Orbscan II之间用于PCT测量的一致性。结果:在正常组中,通过超声测厚法,Galilei和Orbscan II测得的平均CCT分别为551.0±39.4、566.9±33.5和565.5±40.9μm(P <0.001)。圆锥角膜组的相应数字分别为492.0±61.7、502.0±42.1和470.6±56.9μm(P <0.001)。伽利略(Galilei)和Orbscan II的正常组的平均PCT分别为612.5±35.3和640.9±38.0μm(P <0.001),圆锥角膜组的平均PCT为567.6±35.2和595.1±41.4μm(P <0.001)。两组中通过不同设备获得的CCT和PCT测量值显着相关。结论:要测量CCT,可以在正常眼中互换使用Galilei和Orbscan II,但不能在圆锥角膜眼中使用。对于PCT,由Galilei和Orbscan II获得的测量值之间存在系统误差。但是,可以使用常数将光学测厚仪的读数更改为通过超声波测厚仪获得的读数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号