...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences >Comparison of a CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) Laser and Tissue Glue with Conventional Surgical Techniques in Circumcision
【24h】

Comparison of a CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) Laser and Tissue Glue with Conventional Surgical Techniques in Circumcision

机译:包皮环切术中传统手术技术与二氧化碳激光和组织胶的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction : ? CO 2 (Carbon Dioxide) laser application in circumcision, for cutting and coagulation, has been reported to have excellent results. Also, tissue glue has been reported to have advantages over sutures for approximation of wound edges. Most previous studies focused on comparisons between CO 2 laser and scalpel, or between tissue glue and sutures. This study prospectively compared the results and complications CO 2 laser and tissue glue, with standard surgical techniques in circumcision. Methods : Thirty boys were prospectively divided into two groups. Group 1 ( n = 17) underwent circumcision by scalpel with approximation of the wound edges using chromic catgut sutures. Group 2 ( n = 13) underwent circumcision with CO 2 laser and approximation of the wound edges using tissue glue. Patient age, indications for surgery, operative time, wound swelling, bleeding, wound infection, local irritation, pain score, and cosmetic appearance were recorded. Results : ?Group 1 had a significantly longer operative time (P= 0.011), higher rate of local irritation (P= 0.016), and poorer cosmetic appearance (P& 0.001) than group 2. Bleeding only occurred in one patient in group 1. There were no significant differences in pain score, wound infection rate, or cost of surgery between the two groups. Conclusions: ? CO 2 laser and tissue glue have advantages over standard surgical techniques in circumcision, with a significantly shorter operative time, lower rate of local irritation, and better cosmetic appearance. The cost of surgery is similar between the two groups.
机译:介绍 : ?据报道,在包皮环切术中使用CO 2(二氧化碳)激光进行切割和凝结,效果极佳。另外,据报道组织胶在缝合伤口边缘方面比缝合线具有优势。以前的大多数研究都集中在比较CO 2激光和手术刀之间,或组织胶和缝合线之间的比较上。这项研究前瞻性地比较了包皮环切术中CO 2激光和组织胶与标准手术技术的结果和并发症。方法:前瞻性将30名男孩分为两组。第1组(n = 17)采用铬皮肠线缝合术,通过手术刀行包皮环切术,伤口边缘接近。第2组(n = 13)用CO 2激光进行包皮环切术,并使用组织胶将伤口边缘逼近。记录患者年龄,手术指征,手术时间,伤口肿胀,出血,伤口感染,局部刺激,疼痛评分和外观。结果:与第2组相比,第1组的手术时间(P = 0.011)明显更长,局部刺激率更高(P = 0.016),并且外观较差(P <0.001)。两组之间的疼痛评分,伤口感染率或手术费用无显着差异。结论:与包皮环切术相比,CO 2激光和组织胶在标准包皮环切术方面具有优势,手术时间明显缩短,局部刺激率更低,并且外观更加美观。两组的手术费用相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号