首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : >Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements
【24h】

Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements

机译:确定准确剂量校准器活性测量方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background In nuclear medicine, liquid radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes are administered to patients by using various types of syringes with different volumes. The activity of each "dose" must be carefully measured and documented prior to administration using an activity calibrator. Methods Calibrator response is a function of the measurement geometry and, in particular, it depends on the syringe type and filling volume. To minimize the uncertainty associated with the measured activity of the syringe, it is necessary to calculate a calibration curve depending on filling volume for each syringe type. This curve can be obtained by fitting experimentally determined volume correction factors. Results A theoretical evaluation of volume correction factors for syringes is reported for three different experimental methods. The aim is to determine the most accurate experimental method among those considered, by examining the expression of uncertainty for the correction factor. This theoretical analysis was then tested experimentally. Conclusion The agreement between the experimental data obtained in the constant activity method and gravimetric method at constant specific activity and the small associated uncertainties show the accuracy of these two procedures; while the volumetric method at constant specific activity could lead to a wrong evaluation of the correction factors.
机译:背景技术在核医学中,通过使用具有不同容积的各种类型的注射器将用于诊断或治疗目的的液体放射性药物施用于患者。在使用活性校准剂进行给药之前,必须仔细测量并记录每个“剂量”的活性。方法校准器响应是测量几何形状的函数,尤其取决于注射器类型和填充量。为了使与测量的注射器活动性相关的不确定性最小化,有必要根据每种注射器类型的填充量来计算校准曲线。该曲线可以通过拟合实验确定的体积校正因子来获得。结果报告了三种不同实验方法的注射器体积校正因子的理论评估。目的是通过检查校正因子的不确定性表达来确定所考虑的方法中最准确的实验方法。然后,对这一理论分析进行了实验测试。结论恒定活度法和重量法在恒定比活度下获得的实验数据和较小的不确定性之间的一致性表明这两种方法的准确性。而固定比活的体积法可能导致对校正因子的错误评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号