首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Energy >Life-Cycle Analyses of Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions of Natural Gas-Based Alternative Vehicle Fuels in China
【24h】

Life-Cycle Analyses of Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions of Natural Gas-Based Alternative Vehicle Fuels in China

机译:中国基于天然气的替代车辆燃料的能耗和温室气体排放的生命周期分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Tsinghua life-cycle analysis model (TLCAM) has been used to examine the primary fossil energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for natural gas- (NG-) based alternative vehicle fuels in China. The results show that (1) compress NG- and liquid NG-powered vehicles have similar well-to-wheels (WTW) fossil energy uses to conventional gasoline- and diesel-fueled vehicles, but differences emerge with the distance of NG transportation. Additionally, thanks to NG having a lower carbon content than petroleum, CNG- and LNG-powered vehicles emit 10–20% and 5–10% less GHGs than gasoline- and diesel-fueled vehicles, respectively; (2) gas-to-liquid- (GTL-) powered vehicles involve approximately 50% more WTW fossil energy uses than conventional gasoline- and diesel-fueled vehicles, primarily because of the low efficiency of GTL production. Nevertheless, since NG has a lower carbon content than petroleum, GTL-powered vehicles emit approximately 30% more GHGs than conventional-fuel vehicles; (3) The carbon emission intensity of the LNG energy chain is highly sensitive to the efficiency of NG liquefaction and the form of energy used in that process.
机译:清华生命周期分析模型(TLCAM)已用于检查中国基于天然气(NG)的替代车辆燃料的主要化石能源消耗和温室气体(GHG)排放。结果表明:(1)压缩天然气驱动和液态天然气驱动的车辆具有与常规汽油和柴油燃料车辆类似的轮对轮(WTW)化石能源使用,但是随着天然气运输距离的增加,差异不断显现。此外,由于天然气的碳含量低于石油,因此天然气和液化天然气驱动的车辆分别比汽油和柴油驱动的车辆少排放10–20%和5–10%的温室气体; (2)气液化(GTL)动力车辆消耗的WTW化石能源比常规的汽油和柴油燃料车辆多约50%,这主要是因为GTL生产效率低。但是,由于天然气的碳含量比石油低,因此使用GTL的汽车排放的温室气体比传统燃料的汽车多出30%。 (3)LNG能源链的碳排放强度对NG液化效率和该过程中使用的能量形式高度敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号