首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chinese Sociology >Regional segregation or industrial monopoly? Dual labor market segmentation and income inequality in China
【24h】

Regional segregation or industrial monopoly? Dual labor market segmentation and income inequality in China

机译:区域隔离还是产业垄断?中国双重劳动力市场分割和收入不平等

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract Using data from the 2010 China Family Panel Study and county- and industry-level statistics, we estimate cross-classified multilevel models to examine the determinants of the income gap among Chinese workers. Results show that both regional and industrial differences are important sources of income inequality in China. Taken together, they account for about one fifth of the total variation in individual income. Among them, differences in county explains 7%, while difference in industry accounts for 14% of the total variation. Further analyses demonstrate that county- and industry-level variables have significant independent effects on individual income even after controlling for individual socio-demographic characteristics and human capital resources. We also explore the potential mechanisms through which macro-level factors function in widening income gaps among Chinese workers. Our results show industrial monopolies have been a key driver of the elevated income inequality in China.
机译:摘要我们使用2010年中国家庭面板研究的数据以及县和行业的统计数据,估计了交叉分类的多层次模型,以检验中国工人之间的收入差距的决定因素。结果表明,地区差异和行业差异都是中国收入不平等的重要根源。两者合计约占个人收入总变化的五分之一。其中,县级差异为7%,而行业差异占总差异的14%。进一步的分析表明,即使在控制了个人的社会人口特征和人力资本资源之后,县级和行业级的变量也对个人收入具有显着的独立影响。我们还探讨了宏观因素在扩大中国工人收入差距中发挥作用的潜在机制。我们的结果表明,工业垄断一直是导致中国收入不平等加剧的主要驱动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号