首页> 外文期刊>JGH OPEN >Postpolypectomy prophylactic clip closure for the prevention of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding: A systematic review
【24h】

Postpolypectomy prophylactic clip closure for the prevention of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding: A systematic review

机译:息肉切除术后预防性夹子闭合预防息肉切除术后延迟出血:系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) is the most common complication of colonoscopic polypectomy. Prophylactic clipping after an uncomplicated polypectomy is increasingly used, but it is unclear if this results in the prevention of DPPB. This study aimed to review prophylactic clip use and its effect on the rates of DPPB. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochran Library were systematically searched for studies (1995–March 2017) that used prophylactic hemoclips and assessed DPPB as an outcome. Of 1402 articles identified, nine papers were eligible for inclusion, evaluating 4311 patients and 7783 polyps; 118 patients experienced a DPPB, and 49 of these patients received prophylactic clips. There was no significant difference in DPPB rates in patients who received prophylactic clipping compared to those who did not (odd ratio: 0.8; 95% confidence interval: 0.36–1.77; P = 0.56). There was also no significant difference in the DPPB of polyps
机译:息肉切除术后延迟出血(DPPB)是结肠镜息肉切除术最常见的并发症。单纯性息肉切除术后的预防性钳夹越来越多,但尚不清楚是否可以预防DPPB。这项研究旨在审查预防性夹子的使用及其对DPPB发生率的影响。系统检索了MEDLINE,Embase和Cochran图书馆以进行研究(1995年至2017年3月),这些研究使用了预防性止血钳并将DPPB评估为结果。在确定的1402篇文章中,有9篇论文符合纳入标准,评估了4311例患者和7783例息肉。 118位患者经历了DPPB,其中49位患者接受了预防性固定。与未接受预防性截断的患者相比,DPPB发生率无显着差异(几率:0.8; 95%置信区间:0.36-1.77; P = 0.56)。息肉的DPPB也无明显差异

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号