The relation between 1 Thessalonians and 2 Thessalonians and the inauthenticity of 2 Thessalonians




The relation between 1 Thessalonians and 2 Thessalonians is a disputed?question. Many scholars argue that 2 Thessalonians is pseudepigraphic, written one or more decades after 1 Thessalonians. ?Others defend?the authenticity of 2 Thessalonians. Wanamaker argues in his recent?commentary that 2 Thessalonians was written before 1 Thessalonians. In?this way the problems raised by the complicated relation between the two?letters would be solved. Wanamaker argues that Timothy on his visit to?Thessalonica (1 ?Thes 3:1-5) brought the letter we call 2 Thessalonians.?Lecompte argues that Silas wrote 1 Thessalonians and that Paul himself?is the author of 2 Thessalonians, so he could correct the misunderstandings caused by Silas's writing. Or perhaps Silas did not exactly write?what Paul had agreed with his co-workers. I will argue in this article?that the arguments used by Wanamaker and Lecompte are invalid for?grammatical reasons. The great resemblance between 1 Thessalonians?and 2 Thessalonians in spite of these different opinions, is best explained?if we see 2 Thessalonians as a pseudepigraphic epistle.
机译:1个帖撒罗尼迦人和2个帖撒罗尼迦人之间的关系是有争议的问题。许多学者认为2 Thessalonians是伪造的,写在1 Thessalonians之后的十多年。 “其他人捍卫”了2个帖撒罗尼迦人的真实性。瓦纳梅克(Wanamaker)在最近的评论中辩称,有2个帖撒罗尼迦人写在1个帖撒罗尼迦人之前。这样,将解决由两个字母之间的复杂关系引起的问题。瓦纳梅克(Wanamaker)认为提摩太(Timothy)在访问塞萨洛尼卡(Thessalonica)(1?Thes 3:1-5)时带了我们称为2个塞萨洛尼西亚人的信。可以纠正塞拉斯撰写的误解。也许西拉斯(Silas)没写清楚吗?保罗同意他的同事们的看法。我将在本文中争论?出于语法原因,Wanamaker和Lecompte使用的论点无效。如果我们将2个帖撒罗尼迦书作为伪书信,那么尽管有这些不同的观点,也可以很好地解释1个帖撒罗尼迦人与2个帖撒罗尼迦人之间的相似之处。



  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

联系方式:18141920177 (微信同号)


京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号