首页> 外文期刊>H-ermes. Journal of Communication >è (im)possibile la repubblica dei beni comuni? Da Kouroukanfouga alle autogestioni locali e ritorno = Is it (im)possible the Republic of Commons? From Kouroukanfouga to local self-government and return
【24h】

è (im)possibile la repubblica dei beni comuni? Da Kouroukanfouga alle autogestioni locali e ritorno = Is it (im)possible the Republic of Commons? From Kouroukanfouga to local self-government and return

机译:共和制(im)共和国有可能吗?从库鲁坎富加(Kouroukanfouga)到当地的自我管理,再回到=(im)可能是下议院吗?从库鲁坎富加到地方自治并返回

获取原文
       

摘要

Is it (im)possible the Republic of Commons? From Kouroukanfouga to local self-government and return. The article discusses the issue of the Commons government. After analyzing the divergence of perspectives between Private Law and Constitutional Law Scholars, the author focuses on the transition of constitutionalism from the “biochemistry Era” to the “fossil Era” in order to investigate the consequences of this evolution in local democracy experiences. Only in this perspective, it is possible to identify differences and limitations of both theories (like those proposed by Ostrom and Wilson) and of the historical experiences (from the Kouroukanfouga Charter to the Constitution of Ecuador) of the Commons government.
机译:下共和国有可能吗?从Kouroukanfouga到地方自治政府,然后返回。本文讨论了下议院政府的问题。在分析了私法和宪政学者之间的观点分歧之后,作者着重于宪政从“生化时代”到“化石时代”的过渡,以研究这种演变对地方民主经验的影响。只有从这个角度出发,才有可能确定两种理论(如奥斯特罗姆和威尔逊所提出的理论)和下议院政府的历史经验(从《库鲁坎富加宪章》到《厄瓜多尔宪法》)的区别和局限。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号