首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research Procedia >Testing the boundaries between the Basel and MARPOL regimes: are they complementary or mutually exclusive?
【24h】

Testing the boundaries between the Basel and MARPOL regimes: are they complementary or mutually exclusive?

机译:测试巴塞尔和MARPOL制度之间的界限:它们是互补还是相互排斥?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Incidents relating to unsafe management of wastes generated due to blending operations on board vessels have ignited an ongoing discussion between two competing legal regimes: the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal (Basel Convention) and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships as modified by its 1978 Protocol (MARPOL). Despite that blending operations of bulk liquid cargoes during the sea voyage have been prohibited, unanswered questions remain regarding the potential applicability of the Basel Convention to ship-generated wastes while on board vessels and after their discharge at port reception facilities. This paper analyzes the relationship between the Basel Convention and MARPOL and the rationale for concluding that these regimes are indeed mutually exclusive.
机译:与船上混合操作所产生的废物的不安全管理有关的事件引发了两个相互竞争的法律制度之间的持续讨论:《控制危险废物越境转移及其处置巴塞尔公约》(《巴塞尔公约》)和《关于控制危险废物越境转移的国际公约》。根据1978年议定书(MARPOL)修改的《防止船舶造成污染》。尽管禁止在海上航行期间进行散装液体货物的混装操作,但关于《巴塞尔公约》对船上产生的废物在船上以及在港口接收设施处排放后可能适用的问题,仍未得到解答。本文分析了《巴塞尔公约》与《防污公约》之间的关系以及得出结论认为这些制度确实是相互排斥的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号