首页> 外文期刊>Verbum et Ecclesia >The doctrines of original sin and the virgin birth: divine revelation or human construct?
【24h】

The doctrines of original sin and the virgin birth: divine revelation or human construct?

机译:原罪和处女诞生的学说:神圣的启示或人类的建构?

获取原文
       

摘要

Two South African theologians, Ben du Toit and Anton van Niekerk, recently published books in which they argued that postmodern believers can no longer subscribe to the doctrines of original sin and the virgin birth. According to them both these doctrines reflect a pre-modern world-view which should be regarded as outdated. However, they would not like to take leave of the grand narrative of Christianity. There are some fundamental flaws in the reasoning of both scholars. The doctrine of the virgin birth is intertwined with the doctrine of original sin, and both are important to the orthodox doctrine of salvation. As it is not viable or consistent to tamper with some of the orthodox doctrines and try to keep the rest intact, we are left with two options, either to discard the whole system and start afresh, or to try and keep the whole package intact. However, biblical research since the Enlightenment has ruled out the second option. The paper argues in support of this case and attempts to offer a different way forward for Christians living in the twenty-first century than the one offered by Du Toit and Van Niekerk.
机译:两位南非神学家本杜·托伊特(Ben du Toit)和安东·范·尼克尔(Anton van Niekerk)最近出版了几本书,他们在书中认为,后现代的信徒不再能够接受原罪和处女的教义。他们认为,这两种学说都反映了应被视为过时的前现代世界观。但是,他们不想离开基督教的宏大叙事。两位学者的推理都有一些根本的缺陷。处女出生的学说与原罪的学说交织在一起,两者对于救赎的正统学说都是重要的。由于篡改某些正统的学说并试图保持其余的学说是不可行或不统一的,因此我们有两个选择,要么放弃整个系统并重新开始,要么尝试使整个程序包保持完整。但是,自启蒙运动以来的圣经研究排除了第二种选择。该论文为支持该案提出了论据,并试图为生活在二十一世纪的基督徒提供与杜托伊特和范·尼克尔克所提出的不同的前进道路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号