首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Evaluation of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with piezosurgery versus oscillating saw and chisel osteotomy - a randomized prospective trial
【24h】

Evaluation of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with piezosurgery versus oscillating saw and chisel osteotomy - a randomized prospective trial

机译:压电手术与摆动锯和凿子截骨术联合手术辅助上颌快速扩张的评估-一项随机前瞻性试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Ultrasonic bone-cutting surgery has been introduced as a feasible alternative to the conventional sharp instruments used in craniomaxillofacial surgery because of its precision and safety. The piezosurgery medical device allows the efficient cutting of mineralized tissues with minimal trauma to soft tissues. Piezoelectric osteotome has found its role in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME), a procedure well established to correct transverse maxillary discrepancies. The advantages include minimal risk to critical anatomic structures. The purpose of this clinical comparative study (CIS 2007-237-M) was to present the advantages of the piezoelectric cut as a minimally invasive device in surgically assisted, rapid maxillary expansion by protecting the maxillary sinus mucosal lining. Methods Thirty patients (18 females and 12 males) at the age of 18 to 54 underwent a surgically assisted palatal expansion of the maxilla with a combined orthodontic and surgical approach. The patients were randomly divided into two separate treatment groups. While Group 1 received conventional surgery using an oscillating saw, Group 2 was treated with piezosurgery. The following parameters were examined: blood pressure, blood values, required medication, bleeding level in the maxillary sinus, duration of inpatient stay, duration of surgery and height of body temperature. Results The results displayed no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding laboratory blood values and inpatient stay. The duration of surgery revealed a significant discrepancy. Deploying piezosurgery took the surgeon an average of 10?minutes longer than working with a conventional-saw technique. However, the observation of the bleeding level in the paranasal sinus presented a major and statistically significant advantage of piezosurgery: on average the bleeding level was one category above the one of the remaining patients. Conclusion This method of piezoelectric surgery with all its advantages is going to replace many conventional operating procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Trial registration CIS 2007-237-M
机译:背景技术由于其精确性和安全性,超声波切骨术已被引入作为颅颌面外科手术中使用的常规锋利器械的可行替代方案。压电外科医疗设备可有效切割矿化组织,而对软组织的损伤最小。压电骨凿发现其在手术辅助的上颌快速扩张(SARME)中的作用,该过程已被确立为纠正上颌骨横向差异的方法。优点包括对关键解剖结构的风险最小。本临床比较研究(CIS 2007-237-M)的目的是通过保护上颌窦黏膜衬层,介绍压电切割作为微创器械在外科手术辅助的上颌快速扩张中的优势。方法30例18至54岁的女性(18例女性和12例男性)接受了正畸和外科手术相结合的手术上颌骨assist扩展术。将患者随机分为两个独立的治疗组。在第1组使用摆动锯进行常规手术的同时,第2组则接受了压电手术治疗。检查了以下参数:血压,血液价值,所需药物,上颌窦出血水平,住院时间,手术时间和体温。结果结果显示,两组之间在实验室血常规和住院天数方面无统计学差异。手术时间显示出显着差异。与传统的锯切技术相比,部署压电外科手术使外科医生平均花费了10分钟的时间。但是,对鼻旁窦出血水平的观察显示了压电外科手术的主要优势和统计学上的显着优势:平均而言,出血水平比其余患者之一高。结论这种压电手术方法具有所有优点,它将取代口腔颌面外科手术中的许多常规手术程序。 CIS 2007-237-M试用注册

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号