首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco Induced Diseases >Effectiveness of the ban on tobacco industry sponsorship in Brazil: findings from the ITC Brazil Wave 1 to 3 Surveys (2009 to 2016 - 17)
【24h】

Effectiveness of the ban on tobacco industry sponsorship in Brazil: findings from the ITC Brazil Wave 1 to 3 Surveys (2009 to 2016 - 17)

机译:巴西禁止烟草业赞助的效力:ITC巴西第一波至第三波调查的结果(2009年至2016年-17年)

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: In 2000, Brazil implemented a comprehensive ban on tobacco advertising (except point-of-sale), promotion, and sponsorship, including sponsorship by tobacco brands of national sporting and arts events, then in 2005 adding international sport events. However, a loophole in the law permits company names for sponsorship. This study examines whether this loophole has been exploited by the industry via Brazilians' awareness of tobacco company sponsorship of sporting and arts events between 2009 and 2016-17. Methods: Data were from Waves 1 to 3 (2009, 2012-13, 2016-17) of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Brazil Survey - a cohort survey of approximately 1200 adult smokers and 600 non-smokers in Rio de Janeiro, S?o Paulo, and Porto Alegre. At all three waves, respondents were asked whether they had seen or heard about (1) sport or sporting events and/or (2) music, theatre, art or fashion events sponsored by or connected with cigarette companies. At Waves 2 and 3, tobacco company name recognition was tested by asking respondents whether the following are tobacco companies: Souza Cruz, Nestle, and Pirelle. Data were analyzed using GEE logistic regression models. Results: Awareness of a sport or sporting event sponsored by a cigarette company decreased between 2009 and 2016-17 among both smokers (from 8.7% to 4.7%; p=0.004) and non-smokers (from 11.8% to 5.7%; p=0.008). Awareness of an arts event sponsored by a tobacco company decreased among smokers (from 6.3% to 1.4%; p Conclusions: Although Brazil has not specifically banned tobacco company sponsorship, public awareness of tobacco company sponsorship has decreased over 7 years, possibly suggesting that the industry has not (yet) taken advantage of the loophole.
机译:背景:2000年,巴西全面禁止烟草广告(销售点除外),促销和赞助,包括烟草品牌赞助国家体育和艺术活动,然后在2005年增加国际体育活动。但是,法律上的漏洞允许公司名称获得赞助。这项研究通过巴西人意识到烟草公司在2009年至2016-17年之间赞助体育和艺术活动的意识,研究了该漏洞是否已被业界利用。方法:数据来自国际烟草控制(ITC)巴西调查的第一波至第三波(2009年,2012-13年,2016-17年),该队列调查了南里约热内卢约1200名成年吸烟者和600名非吸烟者Paulo和Porto Alegre。在所有三个浪潮中,受访者都被问到他们是否看过或听说过(1)运动或体育赛事和/或(2)由香烟公司赞助或与之相关的音乐,戏剧,艺术或时尚活动。在第二波和第三波中,通过询问受访者以下烟草公司是否为烟草公司名称识别进行测试:Souza Cruz,Nestle和Pirelle。使用GEE logistic回归模型分析数据。结果:在2009年至2016-17年间,吸烟者和不吸烟者(由8.7%至4.7%; p = 0.004)和由非吸烟者(由11.8%至5.7%; p = 0.008)。吸烟者对烟草公司赞助的艺术活动的意识下降了(从6.3%降至1.4%; p结论):尽管巴西并未明确禁止烟草公司赞助,但在过去的7年中,公众对烟草公司赞助的认识下降了,这可能表明行业尚未(尚未)利用漏洞。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号