首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Test of Integrated Professional Skills: Objective Structured Clinical Examination/Simulation Hybrid Assessment of Obstetrics-Gynecology Residents' Skill Integration
【24h】

Test of Integrated Professional Skills: Objective Structured Clinical Examination/Simulation Hybrid Assessment of Obstetrics-Gynecology Residents' Skill Integration

机译:综合专业技能测验:妇产科医师技能整合的客观结构化临床考试/模拟混合评估

获取原文

摘要

What was known Performance in practice requires physicians to integrate clinical judgment, technical ability, and interpersonal skills.;What is new A 5-station assessment using hybrid simulation that combined standardized patients and simulated scenarios to test a higher order and integrated skills.;Limitations Single-institution study limits generalizability. Some skills were assessed only once; the 5 scenarios do not provide a comprehensive assessment of a resident's skills.;Bottom line A simulation-based, objective structured clinical examination facilitated assessment of competencies that are difficult to observe and measure in a standardized way. Debriefing allowed for identification of performance gaps.;Introduction Physician competence is difficult to capture,1 and deconstructing competence into measurable segments may result in loss of the overall sense of a physician's ability.2–6 The heterogeneous nature of residents' on-the-job training7 necessitates standardized assessment tools that mitigate inherent rater bias.8,9 Reliable evaluation tools are essential for Milestone assessment in the Next Accreditation System for graduate medical education.9 Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) tools generate information about several dimensions of performance, including those difficult to evaluate by traditional means. OSCEs have high validity and educational impact in graduate medical education.10–19 Trained standardized patient raters provide important measures of performance.4,13,20 Educators in procedural-based specialties have developed a proliferation of bench models and simulated environments to evaluate procedural skills.3,21 Skill assessments for procedures using global rating scales and checklists display moderate interrater reliability for performance.22,23 Obstetrician-gynecologists must be able to integrate a wide range of skills, but there are limited tools for assessing integrated skills. The Test of Integrated Professional Skills (TIPS) requires residents to interact with standardized patients in clinical scenarios and perform skills on models for forceps delivery, transvaginal ultrasonography, intrauterine device placement, and laparoscopic suturing. The aim of TIPS is to assess integration of skills on an individual resident. Faculty observers can identify gaps in resident ability and provide immediate feedback and directed teaching. We describe the implementation of the TIPS examination and a comparison of resident performance data from the examination with faculty data obtained during regular rotation evaluations.;Results Twenty-four residents, postgraduate year (PGY)–1 through PGY-4, participated in the TIPS examination. Mean scores across ACGME competencies appeared to improve with level of training (figure 1), although the difference between PGY levels was found to be significant only for procedural skills (1-way analysis of variance F??=??6.92, P?
机译:所谓的“实践中的表现”要求医生整合临床判断,技术能力和人际交往能力。最新的使用混合模拟的5站评估,结合了标准化患者和模拟方案以测试更高级别的综合能力。单机构研究限制了推广性。有些技能只被评估过一次。这五种情况不能对居民的技能进行全面评估。底线基于模拟的客观结构化临床检查有助于评估难以以标准化方式观察和衡量的能力。汇报可以识别出性能差距。简介医师的能力难以掌握,1并且将能力解构为可测量的细分可能会导致医师能力的整体意识丧失。2-6居民在医务室的异质性职业培训7必须使用标准化的评估工具,以减轻内在的评估者偏见。8,9可靠的评估工具对于研究生医学教育的下一认证系统中的里程碑评估至关重要。9客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)工具可生成有关绩效若干方面的信息,包括那些难以通过传统方式进行评估的内容。 OSCE在研究生医学教育中具有很高的效度和教育影响力。10-19受过训练的标准化患者评分者可以提供重要的绩效指标。4,13,20基于过程的专业的教育者已经建立了广泛的基准模型和模拟环境来评估过程技能.3,21对使用全球评分量表和清单进行的程序进行的技能评估显示,绩效表现具有中等的可靠性。22,23妇产科医生必须能够整合多种技能,但是评估综合技能的工具有限。综合专业技能测试(TIPS)要求居民在临床情况下与标准化患者互动,并在钳子分娩,经阴道超声检查,子宫内器械放置和腹腔镜缝合的模型上执行技能。 TIPS的目的是评估居民个人技能的整合。教师观察员可以发现居民能力方面的差距,并提供即时反馈和指导性教学。我们描述了TIPS考试的实施方式,并将居民考试中的表现数据与定期轮岗评估中获得的教职员工数据进行了比较。;结果24名居民,研究生年级(PGY)-1至PGY-4,参加了TIPS检查。尽管发现PGY水平之间的差异仅对程序技能有意义(单向方差分析F ?? = ?? 6.92,P?<6),但ACGME能力的平均得分似乎随训练水平而提高(图1)。 0.001与Bonferroni事后成对比较)。居民之间观察到很大的差异,总体上和每个类别平均值的标准差都很大。在所有地区,居民的平均得分在PGY-1和PGY-4之间都有所提高,但PGY-3和PGY-4居民之间的得分却有所增加,有时甚至有所下降。查看大图(28K)图1综合专业技能测试中的居民表现研究生的平均得分(研究生)(PGY),基于“合格”的测试项目百分率和标准差得出。得分随着PGY年的提高而提高,但表现却存在很大差异。通过Bonferroni事后成对比较的方差单向分析来评估PGY手段之间的差异的重要性。讨论TIPS可能在评估技能整合以及为基于绩效的直接观察和及时反馈提供重要论坛方面很有价值。在TIPS考试中成绩不及平均水平的人没有通过现有的方法被确定

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号