首页> 外文期刊>Postgraduate English: A Journal and Forum for Postgraduates in English (UK) >Decoding the Ancestral Land: The Poetics of Place, Space and Time in V. S. Naipaul’s India Trilogy
【24h】

Decoding the Ancestral Land: The Poetics of Place, Space and Time in V. S. Naipaul’s India Trilogy

机译:解读祖传土地:奈保尔五世的印度三部曲中的地点,空间和时间诗学

获取原文
       

摘要

This essay seeks to explore Naipaul’s aesthetic enunciation of the ancestral land in the India trilogy. By highlighting how Naipaul creates rather than describes landscape in the texts at issue, this study suggests that Naipaul’s poetics of place/space subsumes a realignment between the individual and his environment. In addition, this essay argues that Naipaul uses a specific temporal category (described by Johannes Fabian as “Typological Time”) in order to conceptually structure the ancestral land and that his perception of the Indian civilization involves the use of temporal distancing to the point of denying “coevalness” to the object of enquiry. In this context, this study evokes Fabian’s critique of cultural anthropology.It arguesthat Naipaul’s construction of the?Other?as an epistemic category is effected through a specific use of temporal devices that attempts to unite disparate times and spaces within the dominant representative framework of narration.Besides, this essay seeks to critically analyse the role of “time” in the context of Naipaul’s narrative representation of the ancestral land. In arguing that Naipaul’s “use” of time contributes to the production of knowledge about the?Other, this study seeks to critique the praxis of travel writing that is strongly anchored to visual experience as opposed to the aural or the oral. Broadly speaking, this essay attempts to trace the extent to which Naipaul, by recounting his travels in and through the ancestral land, creates a place as a way of understanding rather than merely evince the gaps between language on the one hand and space/place and time, on the other.
机译:本文旨在探讨奈保尔对印度三部曲中祖传土地的美学诠释。通过强调奈保尔是如何创造而不是在有争议的文本中描述风景的,这项研究表明奈保尔的地点/空间诗学包含了个人与环境之间的重新统一。此外,本文认为,奈保尔使用特定的时间类别(由约翰内斯·法比亚(Johannes Fabian)称为“典型时间”)来概念性地构造祖传土地,并且他对印度文明的理解涉及到时间距离的使用。否认询问对象的“同等性”。在这种背景下,这项研究唤起了法比安对文化人类学的批判。它认为奈保尔将“其他”作为认知范畴的建构是通过特定地运用时间手段来实现的,这些时间手段试图在占主导地位的叙事框架内统一不同的时间和空间。此外,本文试图在奈保尔对祖先土地的叙事表现中,批判地分析“时间”的作用。在争论奈保尔对时间的“利用”有助于产生关于“其他”的知识时,本研究旨在批评旅行写作的实践,而实践的写作牢固地依赖于视觉体验,而不是听觉或口头表达。从广义上讲,本文试图通过回顾奈保尔在祖传土地和祖传土地中的旅行来建立某种程度的空间,以此作为一种理解的方式,而不仅仅是消除一方面的语言与空间/地点之间的差距。时间,另一方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号