首页> 外文期刊>Polish Journal of Radiology >Comparison Between Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Mode and Retrospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated Mode for Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography
【24h】

Comparison Between Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Mode and Retrospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated Mode for Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography

机译:双源CT冠状动脉造影的前瞻性心电门控高音模式和回顾性心电图门控模式的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND We aimed to report the image quality, relationship between heart rate and image quality, amount of contrast agent given to the patients and radiation doses in coronary CT angiography (CTA) obtained by using high-pitch prospectively ECG-gated “Flash Spiral” technique (method A) or retrospectively ECG-gated technique (method B) using 128×2-slice dual-source CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 110 patients who were evaluated with method A and method B technique with a 128×2-detector dual-source CT device were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups based on their heart rates during the procedure, and a relationship between heart rate and image quality were evaluated. The relationship between heart rate, gender and radiation dose received by the patients was compared. RESULTS A total of 1760 segments were evaluated in terms of image quality. Comparison of the relationship between heart rate and image quality revealed a significant difference between heart rate 75 beats/min group whereas <60 beats/min and 60-75 beats/min groups did not differ significantly. The average effective dose for coronary CTA was calculated as 1.11 mSv (0.47–2.01 mSv) for method A and 8.22 mSv (2.19–12.88 mSv) for method B. CONCLUSIONS Method A provided high quality images with doses as low as <1 mSv in selected patients who have low heart rates with a high negative predictive value to rule out coronary artery disease. Although method B increases the amount of effective dose, it provides high diagnostic quality images for patients who have a high heart rate and arrhythmia which makes it is difficult to obtain images.
机译:背景技术我们旨在报告通过使用高音准心电门控“闪光螺旋”技术获得的冠状CT CT(CTA)的图像质量,心率与图像质量之间的关系,给予患者的造影剂数量以及放射剂量(方法A)或使用128×2片双源CT的回顾性ECG门控技术(方法B)。材料与方法本研究共纳入110例患者,他们均采用方法A和方法B以及128×2探测器双源CT装置进行了评估。根据患者在手术过程中的心率将其分为三组,并评估心率与图像质量之间的关系。比较了患者的心率,性别和放射剂量之间的关系。结果在图像质量方面总共评估了1760个片段。心率与图像质量之间关系的比较显示,心率75次/分钟组之间存在显着差异,而<60次/分钟和60-75次/分钟组之间无显着差异。方法A的平均冠状动脉CTA有效剂量为1.11 mSv(0.47–2.01 mSv),方法B的平均有效剂量为8.22 mSv(2.19–12.88 mSv)。结论方法A提供了高质量的图像,剂量低至<1 mSv。选择低心率且阴性预测值高的患者以排除冠心病。尽管方法B增加了有效剂量,但它为具有高心率和心律不齐的患者提供了高质量的诊断图像,这使得难以获得图像。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号