首页> 外文期刊>PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases >Efficacy of novel indoor residual spraying methods targeting pyrethroid-resistant Aedes aegypti within experimental houses
【24h】

Efficacy of novel indoor residual spraying methods targeting pyrethroid-resistant Aedes aegypti within experimental houses

机译:针对室内拟除虫菊酯抗性埃及伊蚊的新型室内残留喷雾方法的功效

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Author summary Vector control is the primary strategy for managing Aedes aegypti and reducing transmission of Aedes-borne diseases; however, the indoor resting behavior of Ae. aegypti and the evolution of insecticide resistance reduces the effectiveness of many vector control tactics. Indoor residual spraying (IRS) is effective against Ae. aegypti, but lengthy application time makes IRS difficult to scale within urban environments. We compared the application and entomological efficacy of Classic IRS against two novel Aedes-targeting IRS application methods (Targeted IRS [TIRS]- insecticide applied to walls below 1.5 m and under furniture and Resting Site TIRS [RS-TIRS]- insecticide applied only under furniture) within experimental houses using a carbamate insecticide. Both TIRS and RS-TIRS took less time to apply and used less insecticide compared to Classic IRS. Mortality of pyrethroid-resistant Ae. aegypti did not differ among treatments out to two months post-application, and there was no difference in mortality between Classic IRS and TIRS out to four months post-application. These data provide evidence that IRS application methods can be improved to take less time and insecticide yet not lose entomological efficacy, making TIRS more scalable within urban environments. However, larger field studies with epidemiologic endpoints are needed to further assess the efficacy of these modified TIRS techniques.
机译:作者总结媒介控制是管理埃及伊蚊和减少伊蚊传播疾病的主要策略。然而,Ae的室内休息行为。埃及和杀虫剂抗性的发展降低了许多媒介控制策略的有效性。室内残留喷雾(IRS)对Ae有效。埃及,但漫长的应用时间使IRS难以在城市环境中扩展。我们将经典IRS的应用和昆虫学功效与两种针对伊蚊的新型IRS应用方法进行了比较(针对Ied [TIRS]-杀虫剂的墙体在1.5 m以下以及在家具和休息场所TIRS [RS-TIRS]-仅在以下条件下施药)家具)中使用氨基甲酸酯类杀虫剂。与经典IRS相比,TIRS和RS-TIRS花费的时间更少,使用的杀虫剂更少。拟除虫菊酯抗性Ae的死亡率。埃及伊斯替尼在施用后两个月之间的治疗之间没有差异,并且古典IRS和TIRS在施用后四个月的死亡率没有差异。这些数据提供了证据,表明可以改进IRS应用方法以花费更少的时间和杀虫剂而又不会失去昆虫学功效,从而使TIRS在城市环境中更具可扩展性。但是,需要进一步进行具有流行病学终点的野外研究,以进一步评估这些改良的TIRS技术的功效。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号