...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution
【24h】

Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution

机译:三级医院急诊剖宫产的决策间隔和围生期结果

获取原文

摘要

Background and objective: A decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) of 30 minutes for emergency Caesarean sections (CS) has been widely recommended, but there is little evidence to support it. Recent studies however, have questioned not only the practicability of this target but also its anticipated beneficial effect on neonatal outcome and medico-legal implications. Our objective in this study was to find out the time between decision-delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean section at a tertiary care institution in Nigeria.Methods: This was a retrospective study of cases of emergency Caesarean section performed over a 12-month period. Relevant data were collected from the labour ward and theatre records and case files of the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria between January 1 and December 31, 2012.Results: A total of 352 emergency Caesarean sections done during the period were reviewed. Only 20 (5.7%) of these were performed within the recommended 30 minutes DDI. The mean DDI was 106.3 + 79.5 minutes and there was no significant correlation between DDI and perinatal outcome. The major causes of delay were anaesthetic delay and busy theatre suits.Conclusion: This study demonstrated a lack of correlation between DDI and perinatal outcome, which may indicate decision delivery interval of 30 minutes or less may not be applicable to all emergency CS, especially in developing countries with infrastructural challenges. However when faced with acute or catastrophic foetal or maternal conditions, expedited delivery is indicated.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305.5470How to cite this:Chukwudi OE, Okonkwo CA. Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution. Pak J Med Sci 2014;30(5):946-950. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305.5470This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
机译:背景与目的:广泛建议紧急剖腹产(CS)的决策间隔为30分钟,但没有证据支持这一点。然而,最近的研究不仅质疑该靶标的实用性,而且还质疑其对新生儿结局和法医学意义的预期有益作用。我们在这项研究中的目的是找出在尼日利亚一家三级医疗机构中,从决定分娩间隔到紧急剖腹产的围产期结局之间的时间。方法:这是一项对12个月内进行的紧急剖腹产病例的回顾性研究。期。在2012年1月1日至2012年12月31日之间,从尼日利亚贝宁市贝宁大学教学医院的劳动病房,剧院记录和病例档案中收集了相关数据。结果:在此期间,共对352例紧急剖腹产进行了回顾。 。在建议的30分钟DDI内仅执行了20次(5.7%)。平均DDI为106.3 + 79.5分钟,DDI与围产期结局之间无显着相关性。结论:这项研究表明DDI与围产期结局之间缺乏相关性,这可能表明30分钟或更短的决策间隔可能不适用于所有紧急CS,尤其是在基础设施挑战的发展中国家。但是,当面对急性或灾难性的胎儿或产妇疾病时,应指示分娩迅速。doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305.5470大专院校急诊剖腹产的决策-分娩间隔和围产期结局。 Pak J Med Sci 2014; 30(5):946-950。 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305.5470这是根据知识共享署名许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)的条款分发的开放访问文章,只要适当引用了原始作品,便可以在任何介质中不受限制地使用,分发和复制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号