首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan Heart Journal >TO ASSESS THE ADEQUACY OF CORONARY STENTS DEPLOYMENT (APPOSITION)WITH INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND IN COMPARISON WITH CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY
【24h】

TO ASSESS THE ADEQUACY OF CORONARY STENTS DEPLOYMENT (APPOSITION)WITH INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND IN COMPARISON WITH CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY

机译:评估血管内超声与冠状动脉造影比较冠状动脉支架部署(定位)的适当性

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To determine the adequacy of stent deployment (apposition) as assessed by IVUS and its comparison with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Methodology: In this comparative study we analyzed the stents for adequate deployment in 100 patients who were randomly selected from the patients who underwent PCI either with bare metal or drug eluting stent comparing QCA with IVUS at our catheterization laboratory, Cardiology department. The study was conducted from August 2010 to February 2011. We used Volcano therapeutic IVUS system employing Volcano - eagle eye Gold catheter. Stents were said to be adequately deployed when there was (1) complete apposition of the stent struts over the entire length of stent. A performa was used to collect patient's details and record the IVUS analysis. SPSS version 15 was used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 100 study subjects were included in the study, mean age was 54.38 ± 9.97 years and 85% (85) were male. Diabetics were 40 %(40), 47%(47) were hypertensives, 46%(46) were dylipidemic and 36%(36) were smokers and 40%(40) had a previous myocardial infarction. It was observed that 85% (34) of the cases had their struts adequately apposed while in 15%(06) stent apposition was inadequate and needed to be further dilated .Most of the stents (52.5%) used were Endeavor. LAD was stented in 72.5 % (72) followed Circumflex12.5 %( 12), RCA 10 %( 10) while Ramus and OM1 in5 %( 6). Conclusion: In significant number of patients stents were not adequately deployed requiring re-ballooning to optimize the results as assessed by IVUS.
机译:目的:确定通过IVUS评估的支架展开(并置)的适当性,并将其与定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)进行比较。方法:在本比较研究中,我们分析了100例患者的支架是否适当部署,这些患者是从我们的导管室心血管病实验室比较QCA和IVUS的裸露金属或药物洗脱支架行PCI的患者中随机选择的。该研究于2010年8月至2011年2月进行。我们使用了采用火山-鹰眼金导管的Voluso治疗性IVUS系统。当(1)在支架的整个长度上完全并置支架撑杆时,据说支架已充分展开。使用performa来收集患者的详细信息并记录IVUS分析。 SPSS版本15用于分析数据。结果:共纳入100名研究对象,平均年龄为54.38±9.97岁,其中85%(85)为男性。糖尿病患者中,高血压患者占40%(40),高血压患者占47%(47),血脂异常患者占46%(46),吸烟者中糖尿病占36%(36),先前有心肌梗塞的占40%(40)。观察到有85%(34)的患者的支杆充分并置,而15%(06)的患者的支架置放不足,需要进一步扩大。使用的大多数支架(52.5%)是Endeavor。 LAD支架置入72.5%(72),其次是Circumflex12.5%(12),RCA 10%(10),而Ramus和OM1支架置入5%(6)。结论:大量患者未充分部署支架,需要重新气囊以优化IVUS评估的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号