首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review
【24h】

The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review

机译:质子束放射治疗在恶性中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤患儿中的有效性和安全性:系统评价方案

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background The aim of this study is to use a systematic review framework to identify and synthesise the evidence on the use of proton beam therapy (PBT) for the treatment of children with CNS tumours and where possible compare this to the use of photon radiotherapy (RT). Methods Standard systematic review methods aimed at minimising bias will be employed for study identification, selection and data extraction. Twelve electronic databases have been searched, and further citation, hand searching and reference checking will be employed. Studies assessing the effects of PBT used either alone or as part of a multimodality treatment regimen in children with CNS tumours will be included. Relevant economic evaluations will also be identified. The outcomes are survival (overall, progression-free, event-free, disease-free), local and regional control rates, short- and long-term adverse events, functional status measures and quality of survival. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies for inclusion in the review. All interventional study designs will be eligible for inclusion in the review. However, initial scoping searches indicate the evidence base is likely to be limited to case series studies, with no studies of a higher quality being identified. Quality assessment will be undertaken using pre-specified criteria and tailored to study design if applicable. Studies will be combined using a narrative synthesis, with differences in results between studies highlighted and discussed in relation to the patient population, intervention and study quality. Where appropriate, if no studies of a comparative design are identified, outcomes will be compared against a range of estimates from the literature for similar populations and treatment regimens from the best available evidence from studies that include the use of advanced conventional photon therapy. Discussion The evidence base for the use of PBT in children with CNS tumours is likely to be relatively sparse, highly heterogeneous and potentially of a low quality with small sample sizes. Furthermore, selection and publication biases may limit the internal and external validity of studies. However, any tentative results from the review on potential treatment effects can be used to plan better quality research studies that are of a design appropriate for outcome comparison with conventional therapy. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42015029583
机译:背景技术本研究的目的是使用系统的综述框架来鉴定和综合有关使用质子束疗法(PBT)治疗中枢神经系统肿瘤患儿的证据,并在可能的情况下将其与使用光子放射疗法(RT)进行比较。 )。方法将采用旨在减少偏倚的标准系统评价方法进行研究鉴定,选择和数据提取。已经搜索了十二个电子数据库,并将进一步引用文献,进行手工搜索和参考检查。将包括评估PBT对CNS肿瘤患儿单独或作为多模态治疗方案一部分使用的效果的研究。还将确定相关的经济评估。结果是生存率(总体,无进展,无事件,无疾病),局部和区域控制率,短期和长期不良事件,功能状态指标和生存质量。两名审稿人将独立筛选并选择要纳入审阅的研究。所有干预研究设计均符合纳入评价的条件。但是,最初的范围界定研究表明,证据基础可能仅限于案例系列研究,没有发现质量更高的研究。质量评估将使用预先指定的标准进行,并在适用的情况下针对研究设计进行量身定制。研究将使用叙述性综合进行合并,研究结果之间的差异将根据患者群体,干预措施和研究质量进行强调和讨论。在适当的情况下,如果未确定比较设计的研究,则将结果与文献中针对相似人群和治疗方案的一系列估计值进行比较,这些估计值来自研究的最佳证据,其中包括使用先进的常规光子疗法。讨论在患有中枢神经系统肿瘤的儿童中使用PBT的证据基础可能相对稀疏,高度异质性,并且可能在小样本量的情况下质量较低。此外,选择和发表的偏见可能会限制研究的内部和外部有效性。然而,任何有关潜在治疗效果的初步评估结果都可用于计划质量更高的研究,这些研究的设计适合与常规疗法进行疗效比较。系统审核注册PROSPERO CRD42015029583

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号