首页> 外文期刊>Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy >New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone
【24h】

New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone

机译:评估歧视行为普遍性的新非随机模型:甲氧麻黄酮的初步研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background An advantage of randomised response and non-randomised models investigating sensitive issues arises from the characteristic that individual answers about discriminating behaviour cannot be linked to the individuals. This study proposed a new fuzzy response model coined 'Single Sample Count' (SSC) to estimate prevalence of discriminating or embarrassing behaviour in epidemiologic studies. Methods The SSC was tested and compared to the established Forced Response (FR) model estimating Mephedrone use. Estimations from both SSC and FR were then corroborated with qualitative hair screening data. Volunteers (n = 318, mean age = 22.69 ± 5.87, 59.1% male) in a rural area in north Wales and a metropolitan area in England completed a questionnaire containing the SSC and FR in alternating order, and four questions canvassing opinions and beliefs regarding Mephedrone. Hair samples were screened for Mephedrone using a qualitative Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry method. Results The SSC algorithm improves upon the existing item count techniques by utilizing known population distributions and embeds the sensitive question among four unrelated innocuous questions with binomial distribution. Respondents are only asked to indicate how many without revealing which ones are true. The two probability models yielded similar estimates with the FR being between 2.6% - 15.0%; whereas the new SSC ranged between 0% - 10%. The six positive hair samples indicated that the prevalence rate in the sample was at least 4%. The close proximity of these estimates provides evidence to support the validity of the new SSC model. Using simulations, the recommended sample sizes as the function of the statistical power and expected prevalence rate were calculated. Conclusion The main advantages of the SSC over other indirect methods are: simple administration, completion and calculation, maximum use of the data and good face validity for all respondents. Owing to the key feature that respondents are not required to answer the sensitive question directly, coupled with the absence of forced response or obvious self-protective response strategy, the SSC has the potential to cut across self-protective barriers more effectively than other estimation models. This elegantly simple, quick and effective method can be successfully employed in public health research investigating compromising behaviours.
机译:背景技术调查敏感问题的随机响应和非随机模型的优点来自于以下特征:关于歧视行为的个人答案无法与个人联系在一起。这项研究提出了一种新的模糊反应模型,称为“单样本计数”(SSC),用于估计流行病学研究中歧视性或尴尬行为的普遍性。方法对SSC进行测试,并将其与估计使用甲氧麻黄酮的强制反应(FR)模型进行比较。然后用定性毛发筛选数据证实了来自SSC和FR的估计。北部威尔士农村地区和英格兰大都市地区的志愿者(n = 318,平均年龄= 22.69±5.87,男性为59.1%)完成了一份包含SSC和FR交替排列的问卷,并通过四个问题探讨了关于麻黄酮。使用定性液相色谱-质谱法对头发样品进行甲氧麻黄酮筛选。结果SSC算法通过利用已知的人口分布对现有项目计数技术进行了改进,并将敏感问题嵌入到具有二项式分布的四个无关的无害问题中。只要求受访者指出多少,而不透露哪些是正确的。两种概率模型得出的估计值相似,FR介于2.6%-15.0%之间;而新的SSC介于0%-10%之间。六个阳性头发样本表明样本中的患病率至少为4%。这些估计值非常接近,为支持新的SSC模型的有效性提供了证据。使用模拟,计算推荐的样本量作为统计功效和预期患病率的函数。结论与其他间接方法相比,SSC的主要优势在于:简单的管理,完成和计算,数据的最大使用率以及所有受访者的面部有效性。由于不需要回答者直接回答敏感问题的关键特征,再加上没有强迫反应或明显的自我保护反应策略,与其他评估模型相比,SSC可以更有效地突破自我保护障碍。这种优雅,简单,快速和有效的方法可以成功地用于调查危害行为的公共卫生研究中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号