首页> 外文期刊>Revista Chilena de Neuropsiquiatria >Nivel de conocimientos sobre demencia frontotemporal en una muestra de médicos que evalúan regularmente a pacientes con demencia en Lima-Perú
【24h】

Nivel de conocimientos sobre demencia frontotemporal en una muestra de médicos que evalúan regularmente a pacientes con demencia en Lima-Perú

机译:定期评估利马-秘鲁痴呆患者的医生样本中额颞叶痴呆的知识水平

获取原文
       

摘要

Physicians with specialty in geriatrics, psychiatry and neurology have not received training about the differential diagnosis of dementia, particularly regarding fronto-temporal dementia (FTD). Objective: To assess the level of knowledge of physicians about FTD. Material and Method: The survey was carried out during symposiums and scientific congresses from January 2016 to July 2017. Inclusion criteria: being a general practitioner or specialist in Geriatrics, Neurology and psychiatry whose training process as a physician and specialist has been carried out in Peruvian universities. We analyzed 217 surveys of which 13 were eliminated. The survey was divided into three parts, the first about general data of doctors, the second part was about the diagnosis of dementia; and the third on specific data of FTD. STATA version 12 was used for the statistical analysis. Results: 90% of the doctors surveyed were specialists in: Psychiatry (41.3%), Geriatrics (31.3%) and Neurology (15.4%). The 98.5% of physicians surveyed claimed to diagnose dementia. The medical specialists performed better when identifying the tests used. 72.1% of the doctors surveyed could not recognize any type of FTD, while 27.9% recognized at least 1 type of FTD. 43.8% of physicians surveyed identified 5 or more of the symptoms presented in FTD. Conclusions: The level of knowledge among medical specialists surveyed about the diagnosis of dementia is acceptable, however it is deficient when it is specifically about the diagnosis of FTD.
机译:老年医学,精神病学和神经病学专业的医生尚未接受过痴呆鉴别诊断的培训,尤其是额颞痴呆(FTD)培训。目的:评估医师对FTD的了解水平。材料和方法:该调查是在2016年1月至2017年7月的专题讨论会和科学大会上进行的。纳入标准:是老年医学,神经病学和精神病学的全科医生或专家,其在秘鲁的医师和专家的培训过程大学。我们分析了217项调查,其中13项被淘汰。该调查分为三个部分,第一部分是关于医生的一般资料,第二部分是关于痴呆的诊断;第二部分是关于痴呆的诊断。第三是FTD的具体数据。使用STATA 12版进行统计分析。结果:接受调查的医生中有90%为以下领域的专科医生:精神病学(41.3%),老年医学(31.3%)和神经病学(15.4%)。接受调查的医师中98.5%声称诊断为痴呆。在确定使用的测试时,医学专家的表现更好。接受调查的医生中有72.1%不能识别任何一种FTD,而27.9%的医生至少识别出一种FTD。 43.8%的被调查医师确定了FTD中出现的5种或以上症状。结论:接受调查的医学专家对痴呆症的诊断水平是可以接受的,但是当专门针对FTD进行诊断时,知识水平是不足的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号