首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Modern Linguistics >Is This a Paraphrase? What Kind? Paraphrase Boundaries and Typology
【24h】

Is This a Paraphrase? What Kind? Paraphrase Boundaries and Typology

机译:这是释义吗?哪一种?释义边界和类型

获取原文
       

摘要

A precise and commonly accepted definition of paraphrasing does not exist. This is one of the reasons that have prevented computational linguistics from a real success when dealing with this phenomenon in its systems and applications. With the aim of helping to overcome this difficulty, in this article, new insights on paraphrase characterization are provided. We first overview what has been said on paraphrasing from linguistics and the new lights shed on the phenomenon from computational linguistics. Under the light of the shortcomings observed, the paraphrase phenomenon is studied from two different perspectives. On the one hand, insights on paraphrase boundaries are set out analyzing paraphrase borderline cases and the interaction of paraphrasing with related linguistic phenomena. On the other hand, a new paraphrase typology is presented. It goes beyond a simple list of types and is embedded in a linguistically-based hierarchical structure. This typology has been empirically validated through corpus annotation and its application in the plagiarism-detection domain.
机译:释义的确切定义和普遍接受的定义不存在。这是在计算语言学的系统和应用程序中处理这种现象时阻止其成功的原因之一。为了帮助克服这一困难,本文提供了有关释义表征的新见解。我们首先概述一下从语言学角度解释的观点,而从计算语言学角度出发的现象也有了新的启示。根据所观察到的缺点,从两个不同的角度研究了复述现象。一方面,对释义边界进行了分析,阐述了释义边界情况以及释义与相关语言现象的相互作用。另一方面,提出了一种新的复述类型。它超出了简单的类型列表,并嵌入了基于语言的层次结构中。通过语料库注释及其在抄袭检测领域中的应用,已对这种类型进行了经验验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号