首页> 外文期刊>SAGE Open >Inclusive Services for Children and Families From CaLD Backgrounds in an Australian Context:
【24h】

Inclusive Services for Children and Families From CaLD Backgrounds in an Australian Context:

机译:在澳大利亚背景下,具有CaLD背景的儿童和家庭的包容性服务:

获取原文
       

摘要

The current Australian government is proposing an agenda focused around social inclusion in an attempt to address the complex issues associated with inequality evident in this country. Despite valiant attempts, many agencies struggle to offer inclusive services, particularly to families who have migrated to Australia from culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) backgrounds. In this study, we surveyed a range of programs identified by key informants as offering inclusive service delivery with the aim of identifying those aspects of their practice they believed facilitated successful inclusion. We then attempt to position our findings within recently emerging critiques of the concept of social inclusion, of which our participants appeared unaware. This critique addresses the fundamental purpose of social inclusion, and the strategies commonly used to achieve it, arguing that these are based on a deficit approach that positions those who are excluded as a??other.a?? In identifying those who are excluded as a??othera?? and attempting to include them into a hegemonic idea of civil society as functioning citizens, are agencies actually being racist?
机译:澳大利亚现任政府正在提出一项围绕社会包容的议程,以期解决与该国明显的不平等相关的复杂问题。尽管做出了种种英勇的尝试,但许多代理机构仍努力提供包容性服务,特别是向那些从文化和语言上的差异(CaLD)背景移居澳大利亚的家庭。在这项研究中,我们调查了由关键信息提供者确定的提供包容性服务交付的一系列计划,目的是确定他们认为有助于成功纳入的做法的那些方面。然后,我们尝试将我们的发现置于最近出现的对社会包容概念的批评之中,而我们的参与者似乎对此并不了解。该批评论及社会包容的基本目的,以及实现这一目标的常用策略,认为这些批评是基于一种赤字方法,将那些被排斥的人定位为“其他”。在识别那些被排除在外的人时并试图将它们纳入公民社会作为运作公民的霸权思想中,代理机构实际上是种族主义者吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号