首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Social Sciences >Is Wal-Mart a Bad Neighbor? Repeat Sales Evidence on How Residential Property Values React to a New Big-Box Store
【24h】

Is Wal-Mart a Bad Neighbor? Repeat Sales Evidence on How Residential Property Values React to a New Big-Box Store

机译:沃尔玛是坏邻居吗?重复销售证据,证明住宅物业的价值如何影响新的大型商店

获取原文
       

摘要

While there is anecdotal evidence that home values decline when a big-box store, such as Wal-Mart, decides to locate in the area, there is little empirical evidence of that effect. This paper uses a repeat sales model to measure the impact that an arrival has by comparing residential property values, and the speed of sale of the property. Results demonstrate that there is a “news effect” surrounding the arrival, and that the total effect is small, on both property resale value and the number of days that a property spends on the market prior to sale. That impact depends on the type of store, but in the worst-case scenario, the arrival of a big box store is associated with a decline equal in size to mistiming the market by a year. Interestingly, all impacts improve with time, so that even the worst impacts are completely eliminated shortly after a store opening, and the long-run impact on property values is unambiguously positive. So Wal-Mart is quite the opposite of a bad neighbor, if the resident can be patient for the long-term effect.
机译:尽管有传闻证据表明,当大型商店(如沃尔玛)决定在该地区开展业务时,房屋价值下降了,但实证证据很少。本文使用重复销售模型,通过比较住宅物业的价值和物业的销售速度来衡量入境者的影响。结果表明,到来货品有“新闻效应”,并且总的影响很小,既对房地产的转售价值,也对房地产在出售前在市场上停留的天数都有影响。这种影响取决于商店的类型,但在最坏的情况下,大盒子商店的到来与规模的减少相关,而这种下降等于使市场蒙受了一年的模糊。有趣的是,所有影响都会随着时间而改善,因此即使最坏的影响也不会在商店开业后立即被完全消除,并且对房地产价值的长期影响无疑是积极的。因此,如果居民可以忍受长期影响,那么沃尔玛与坏邻居相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号