首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Philosophy >“Secularization” or Plurality of Meaning Structures? A. Schutz’s Concept of a Finite Province of Meaning and the Question of Religious Rationality
【24h】

“Secularization” or Plurality of Meaning Structures? A. Schutz’s Concept of a Finite Province of Meaning and the Question of Religious Rationality

机译:意义结构的“世俗化”还是多元化?舒茨的有限意义观和宗教合理性问题

获取原文
       

摘要

Referring to basic Weberian notions of rationalization and secularization, I try to find a more accurate sense of the term “secularization”, intending to describe adequately the position of religion in modernity. The result of this query is—or at least should be—a new, original conceptualization of religion as one of finite provinces of meaning within one paramount reality of the life-world, as defined by Alfred Schutz. I proceed by exposing a well known, major oversimplification of the Weberian concept of secularization, very well outlined in Peter Berger’s The sacred canopy, in order to point to the genuine, much more differentiated position of Max Weber in this matter (especially from the period of Foundations of social economic and Economy and society), and, consequently, to return to the roots of Berger’s thought: phenomenological sociology of Alfred Schutz, an attempt to assure the philosophical foundations of Weber’s sociological theory. At a closer glimpse, transformation of religion in the modern process of rationalization does not consist—according to Weber—in eliminating religion and thus depriving society of the religious source of meaning, but in parallel emancipation of many different domains of rationality, including religion itself. Using Schutz’s analysis of the social world as a complex structure of many different final provinces of meaning, I describe religion as such a province and show what does the process of rationalization of this province consist and what it should consist in: a complex, ongoing exchange of cognitive relevances and contents, combined with growing autonomy of many different sub-worlds. Schutz’s theory of symbol, rooted in Edmund Husserl’s description of constitution of complex objects in mono- and polythetic acts of consciousness, moves the analysis to the epistemological level, pointing to a chance of intensifying our cognitive relation to reality through increasing interpenetration of various sub-universes of meaning.
机译:在谈到韦伯式的合理化和世俗化概念时,我试图找到对“世俗化”一词的更准确的理解,旨在充分描述宗教在现代性中的地位。该查询的结果是-或至少应该是-像阿尔弗雷德·舒茨(Alfred Schutz)所定义的那样,将宗教作为生活世界中最重要的现实中有限的意义领域之一进行了全新的原始概念化。首先,我揭露了韦伯式的世俗化概念的一个众所周知的重大过分简化,彼得·伯杰(Peter Berger)的《神圣的树冠》对此作了很好的概述,目的是指出马克斯·韦伯在这件事上的真实,更加与众不同的立场(尤其是从(社会经济,经济和社会基础)),从而回到伯杰思想的根源:阿尔弗雷德·舒茨(Alfred Schutz)的现象学社会学,试图确保韦伯社会学理论的哲学基础。乍一看,按照韦伯的观点,在现代合理化过程中宗教的转变并不意味着消灭宗教并因此剥夺了社会的宗教意义来源,而是同时解放了许多不同的理性领域,包括宗教本身。使用舒茨对社会世界作为许多不同的最终意义省份的复杂结构的分析,我将宗教描述为一个省份,并说明该省的合理化过程包括什么以及它应包括的内容:复杂的,持续的交流认知相关性和内容的结合,以及许多不同子世界日益增长的自主性。舒茨的符号理论源于埃德蒙·胡塞尔(Edmund Husserl)对单意识和多义意识行为中复杂物体的构成的描述,将分析推向了认识论的层次,指出通过增加各个子类之间的相互渗透来加强我们与现​​实的认知关系的机会。意义的宇宙。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号