首页> 外文期刊>Rural and Remote Health >Myocardial infarction in a patient with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia in a remote location
【24h】

Myocardial infarction in a patient with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia in a remote location

机译:偏远地区遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张患者的心肌梗塞

获取原文
       

摘要

Context:Prompt reperfusion therapy in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) improves outcomes and is therefore a key part of the management of affected patients. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is preferred over thrombolysis; however, when PPCI is not available within an acceptable time frame, thrombolysis should be administered without delay. When thrombolysis is contraindicated, this can lead to delays in achieving coronary artery reperfusion, and making therapeutic decisions is more challenging. Issues:A 57-year-old woman with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) presented with chest pain to local medical services on a Scottish island. Initial assessment including 12-lead ECG was performed without delay and led to a diagnosis of infero-lateral STEMI. Initial treatment was with antiplatelets, nitrate and opiate analgesia. Immediate reperfusion therapy with thrombolysis was considered; however, this was contraindicated due to the diagnosis of HHT. Following discussion with the regional centre she was treated with heparin and urgently transferred to the nearest catheterisation laboratory for PPCI. Unfortunately delays in transfer were caused by inclement weather conditions, which precluded the use of an air ambulance. The patient reached a cardiac catheterisation laboratory by road. A total occlusion of a distal branch of the circumflex artery was found to be the culprit lesion and despite wiring and ballooning good blood flow was not restored. However, she made a good recovery and was discharged home on secondary prevention therapy, which was modified to take into account her increased bleeding risk associated with her pre-existing HHT. Lessons learned:In this case, the patient presented early to medical services following the onset of symptoms and was immediately assessed, resulting in a prompt accurate diagnosis at first medical contact. Despite this, the presence of HHT, and the particularities of living in a remote area compounded by unfavourable weather conditions, resulted in a delay in definitive treatment that would have been available to a similar patient presenting in an urban setting. In remote regions where reperfusion therapy for acute STEMI relies more often on thrombolysis, an increased awareness of the issues around the contraindication of thrombolysis, together with early discussion with a regional cardiology service leads to the most efficient way of establishing the best treatment plan for individual patients. Despite this, rural patients may remain at a disadvantage.
机译:背景:对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)进行及时的再灌注治疗可改善预后,因此是治疗受影响患者的关键部分。首选经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)优于溶栓治疗;但是,如果在可接受的时间内无法使用PPCI,则应立即进行溶栓治疗。禁忌溶栓时,这可能会延迟实现冠状动脉再灌注,并且做出治疗决定更具挑战性。问题:一位患有遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张(HHT)的57岁妇女因胸部疼痛向苏格兰一个岛上的当地医疗服务部门求诊。包括12导联心电图在内的初步评估无延迟地进行,并诊断为下侧STEMI。最初的治疗是使用抗血小板药,硝酸盐和阿片类镇痛药。考虑立即进行溶栓再灌注治疗。然而,由于HHT的诊断,这是禁忌的。与区域中心讨论后,她接受了肝素治疗,并紧急转移到最近的PPCI导管检查实验室。不幸的是,转机延误是由于恶劣的天气条件造成的,因此无法使用空中救护车。该患者经公路到达心脏导管实验室。发现旋律动脉远端分支的完全闭塞是罪魁祸首,尽管有布线和气球膨胀,但仍未恢复良好的血流。但是,她恢复良好,并因二级预防疗法而出院,考虑到与既往HHT相关的出血风险增加,对其进行了修改。经验教训:在这种情况下,患者在症状发作后及早就医,并立即进行了评估,从而在首次就医时迅速做出了准确的诊断。尽管如此,HHT的存在,以及生活在偏远地区的特殊性,加上不利的天气条件,导致确定性治疗的延误,而本来可以提供给在城市环境中就诊的类似患者使用。在偏远地区,急性STEMI的再灌注治疗更多地依赖于溶栓,对溶栓禁忌症相关问题的认识不断提高,以及与区域心脏病学服务的早期讨论,为建立针对个体的最佳治疗计划提供了最有效的方法耐心。尽管如此,农村患者可能仍然处于不利地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号