首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas >A pondera??o como mecanismo de solu??o de conflitos entre princípios norteadores do Direito penal ambiental.
【24h】

A pondera??o como mecanismo de solu??o de conflitos entre princípios norteadores do Direito penal ambiental.

机译:加权是解决环境刑法指导原则之间冲突的一种机制。

获取原文
       

摘要

Throughout this study, it was attempted to find out which principle should prevail in cases where there is conflict between the principle of In Dubio pro Reo and the Principle of In Dubio pro Natureo. It is known that if there is a collision between principles, this collision should be analyzed based on weighting method, as well it should apply the technique of sopesamento, in the searching of the collision’s solution. At the end it was concluded that in case of environmental crime, having a conflict between the principles of In Dubio pro Reo and the Principle of In Dubio pro Natureo, the judge shall consider with proportionality the use of principles, backed by the circumstances of each case to determine which principle should prevail, being sure that the Principle of In Dubio pro Reo can only thrive if there is no major damage to the environment, since otherwise, the Principle of In Dubio pro Natureo must prevail.
机译:在整个研究过程中,试图找出在In Dubio pro Reo原则与In Dubio pro Natureo原则之间存在冲突的情况下应优先使用的原则。众所周知,如果原理之间存在冲突,则应基于加权方法分析此冲突,并在解决问题的搜索中应用sopesamento技术。最后得出的结论是,在环境犯罪的情况下,In Dubio pro Reo原则与In Dubio pro Natureo原则之间存在冲突,法官应按比例考虑使用原则,并以每种情况为依据确定哪个原则应占优势的情况,请确保仅在不对环境造成重大损害的情况下,才应遵守In Dubio pro Reo原则,否则将必须适用In Dubio pro Natureo原则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号