首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental >Performance of evaporation estimation methods compared with standard 20 m2 tank
【24h】

Performance of evaporation estimation methods compared with standard 20 m2 tank

机译:与标准20 m2储罐相比的蒸发估算方法的性能

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The low reliability of evaporation estimates in reservoirs challenges the management of water resources, especially when drought occurs. The evaporation rates measured in buried tanks (20 m2 evaporimeters) are close to that of lakes. However, there are few studies in Brazil using long data sets with this type of tank. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate evaporation estimates of free water surface using the method of Penman (1948) and other five empirical equations in comparison with data from a 20 m2 tank observed during 10 years. The annual relationship between rainfall and evaporation was 1.0, showing variations in dry years (0.7) and rainy years (1.3). Among all evaluated methods, Linacre (1993) shows the best performance. Camargo et al. (1999) has very good estimates using air temperature as input variable and is a simple and reliable alternative when data are missing.
机译:水库蒸发估算的低可靠性挑战了水资源的管理,尤其是在发生干旱时。在掩埋池(20平方米蒸发仪)中测得的蒸发速率接近湖泊。但是,在巴西,很少有研究使用此类储罐的长数据集。在这种情况下,本研究旨在使用Penman(1948)的方法和其他五个经验方程式,与十年间观察到的20 m2储罐的数据进行比较,以评估自由水表面的蒸发估算。降雨与蒸发之间的年均关系为1.0,表明在干旱年份(0.7)和雨季(1.3)有所不同。在所有评估的方法中,Linacre(1993)表现出最好的性能。 Camargo等。 (1999)使用空气温度作为输入变量有很好的估计,当缺少数据时,它是一种简单而可靠的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号