首页> 外文期刊>Research on Humanities and Social Sciences >Philosophical-Educational Analysis of Iranian and English Picture-Story Books Based on 'Authority and Freedom' Categories
【24h】

Philosophical-Educational Analysis of Iranian and English Picture-Story Books Based on 'Authority and Freedom' Categories

机译:基于“权威与自由”类别的伊朗和英语图画故事书的哲学教育分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Authority and freedom paradox is one of the most important issues in the philosophy of education as it is in the children's literature. Techniques used by authors of children's literature works, originate from their view on the child. The purpose of this paper is to compare Philosophical-Educational analysis of Iranian and English picture-story books via discovering and investigating the authors' view on "authority and freedom" categories. The research is a kind of exploratory and descriptive research with non-emerging approach to research design. Purposive sampling and documentary method of data collection and interpretive-descriptive method of data analysis were used. Two picture-story books "The Tale of Peter Rabbit" by Beatrix Potter and "Hypa and Shypa's Shoes" by Morteza Khosronejad had been chosen for analysis. The research question is based on Iranian and English authors' viewpoints on "authority and freedom" in the children's literature and comparing them. Revealing the techniques in the works is important for the authors, because they sometimes use these techniques unconsciously. Denuding the techniques can also be considered by critics, parents, teachers, and even children. The results show that the authors' view on the child affects the way of writing books and the use of various techniques. The results also indicate that although they belong to different social and cultural settings, the Iranian and English authors' viewpoints on the child are an independent being that is free, adventurous, vivacious, and able to solve the problems. The authors also are aware of the existence and importance of "authority and freedom" categories in the children's literature. Although Beatrix Potter makes a beautiful balance between the author's authority and the audience's freedom at the end of his story, Khosronejad delicately accepts child freedom beside the adult support and inspection. Keywords: Authority and Freedom paradox, Picture-story Books, Beatrix Potter, Morteza Khosronejad
机译:权威与自由悖论是儿童文学中教育哲学中最重要的问题之一。儿童文学作品作者所使用的技术源自他们对儿童的看法。本文旨在通过发现和调查作者关于“权威与自由”类别的观点,比较伊朗和英语图画小说的哲学教育分析。该研究是一种探索性和描述性研究,采用非新兴方法进行研究设计。使用了数据收集的有目的抽样和记录方法以及数据分析的解释性描述方法。比阿特丽克斯·波特(Beatrix Potter)撰写的两本图画小说《彼得兔的故事》和莫特萨·科斯罗纳贾德(Morteza Khosronejad)撰写的《海帕和希帕的鞋子》被选作分析对象。该研究问题基于伊朗和英国作者关于儿童文学中“权威与自由”的观点并进行了比较。揭示作品中的技术对作者很重要,因为他们有时会无意识地使用这些技术。评论家,父母,老师甚至孩子也可以考虑剥夺这些技巧。结果表明,作者对孩子的看法影响了写书的方式和各种技巧的使用。结果还表明,尽管伊朗人和英国人属于不同的社会和文化背景,但他们对孩子的看法是一个独立的个体,具有自由,冒险,活泼且能够解决问题的能力。作者还意识到儿童文学中“权威和自由”类别的存在和重要性。尽管比阿特丽克斯·波特(Beatrix Potter)在故事的结尾就在作者的权威和观众的自由之间取得了很好的平衡,但霍斯涅贾德却在成人的支持和检查下巧妙地接受了儿童的自由。关键字:权威与自由悖论,图画书,比阿特丽克斯·波特,莫尔蒂萨·科斯纳雅德

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号