首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing >Examination of the Potential of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry for Rapid Nondestructive Field Measurement of Grass Biomass
【24h】

Examination of the Potential of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry for Rapid Nondestructive Field Measurement of Grass Biomass

机译:地面激光扫描和运动结构摄影测量技术对草类生物质快速无损测量的潜力研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Above ground biomass (AGB) is a parameter commonly used for assessment of grassland systems. Destructive AGB measurements, although accurate, are time consuming and are not easily undertaken on a repeat basis or over large areas. Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry and Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) are two technologies that have the potential to yield precise 3D structural measurements of vegetation quite rapidly. Recent advances have led to the successful application of TLS and SfM in woody biomass estimation, but application in natural grassland systems remains largely untested. The potential of these techniques for AGB estimation is examined considering 11 grass plots with a range of biomass in South Dakota, USA. Volume metrics extracted from the TLS and SfM 3D point clouds, and also conventional disc pasture meter settling heights, were compared to destructively harvested AGB total (grass and litter) and AGB grass plot measurements. Although the disc pasture meter was the most rapid method, it was less effective in AGB estimation (AGB grass r 2 = 0.42, AGB total r 2 = 0.32) than the TLS (AGB grass r 2 = 0.46, AGB total r 2 = 0.57) or SfM (AGB grass r 2 = 0.54, AGB total r 2 = 0.72) which both demonstrated their utility for rapid AGB estimation of grass systems.
机译:地上生物量(AGB)是通常用于评估草地系统的参数。破坏性的AGB测量虽然准确,但是却很费时,而且不易重复进行或在大面积上进行。运动结构(SfM)摄影测量法和陆地激光扫描(TLS)是两项技术,它们有可能很快地对植被进行精确的3D结构测量。近期的进展已导致TLS和SfM在木质生物量估计中的成功应用,但在天然草地系统中的应用仍未经测试。考虑了美国南达科他州的11个具有一定生物量范围的草场,检验了这些技术用于AGB估算的潜力。从TLS和SfM 3D点云中提取的体积指标,以及传统的圆盘牧草仪沉降高度,都与破坏性收获的AGB总量(草和垫料)和AGB草地测量值进行了比较。尽管圆盘牧草仪是最快的方法,但它在AGB估算(AGB草r 2 = 0.42,AGB总r 2 = 0.32)方面的效率不如TLS(AGB草r 2 = 0.46,AGB总r 2 = 0.57)有效)或SfM(AGB草r 2 = 0.54,AGB总r 2 = 0.72),都证明了它们可用于快速评估草系统的AGB。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号