首页> 外文期刊>Religions >Measuring Spirituality and Religiosity in Clinical Settings: A Scoping Review of Available Instruments
【24h】

Measuring Spirituality and Religiosity in Clinical Settings: A Scoping Review of Available Instruments

机译:在临床环境中测量精神和宗教信仰:可用仪器的范围回顾

获取原文
       

摘要

Aims: Numerous measures exist that assess dimensions of spirituality and religiosity in health, theological and social settings. In this review, we aim to identify and evaluate measures assessing factors relating to spirituality and religiosity in clinical settings. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases with search terms relating to spirituality, religiosity that also included well-being, needs, distress and beliefs used in self-reporting and clinician-administered measures. Only articles relating to the validation and subsequent administration of measures used in clinical settings were eligible for review. Results: Of 75 measures selected for initial screening, 25 had been validated and used in clinical settings and were reviewed for this study. Most measures were validated in oncological and palliative care settings where the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being (FACIT-Sp12) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Spiritual, Religious and Personal Beliefs (WHOQOL-SRPB) were most validated and frequently used. Only six measures were found that assessed spiritual distress and/or the needs of which only two had been investigated more than twice. Two measures assessing spirituality and religious beliefs in healthcare staff were also reviewed. Conclusions: This review provides a current summary of measures evaluating several dimensions of spirituality and religiosity used in clinical settings. Currently there is a lack of reliable measures evaluating spiritual needs and distress.
机译:目的:存在许多评估健康,神学和社会环境中的灵性和宗教信仰维度的措施。在这篇综述中,我们旨在确定和评估评估临床环境中与灵性和宗教信仰有关的因素的措施。方法:使用PubMed,EMBASE和PsycINFO数据库进行系统的文献搜索,搜索词涉及灵性,宗教信仰,其中还包括自我报告和临床医生管理的措施中所使用的幸福感,需求,困扰和信念。只有与临床环境中使用的措施的验证和后续管理有关的文章才有资格进行审查。结果:在选择用于初始筛查的75项措施中,有25项已通过验证并用于临床,并接受了本研究的审查。大多数措施已在肿瘤和姑息治疗机构中得到验证,其中对慢性病治疗精神健康的功能评估(FACIT-Sp12)和世界卫生组织的生活质量精神,宗教和个人信仰(WHOQOL-SRPB)最为有效,并且经常使用。仅发现了六项评估精神困扰和/或需要的措施,其中只有两项被调查了两次以上。还审查了两种评估医护人员灵性和宗教信仰的措施。结论:本综述提供了评估临床环境中使用的灵性和宗教性几个方面的措施的最新摘要。目前,缺乏评估精神需求和苦难的可靠措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号