首页> 外文期刊>Resource-Efficient Technologies >Comparison of non-linear, linearized 2nd order and reduced to FOPDT models of CSTR using different tuning methods
【24h】

Comparison of non-linear, linearized 2nd order and reduced to FOPDT models of CSTR using different tuning methods

机译:使用不同的调整方法比较CSTR的非线性,线性二阶和简化为FOPDT模型

获取原文
       

摘要

Process modelling and design of controller based on the process model is an important step in the process control. In the present study three different mathematical models i.e. non-linear process model, linearized 2nd order model and first order with dead time (FOPDT) model of a CSTR with the concentration of output of product as controlled parameter were developed. Proportional Integral (PI) controllers were designed based on 2nd order and FOPDT models of a CSTR using SIMC (Skogestad internal model control), Hagglund and Astrom, and a computational method with 5% overshoot.In all the three tuning methods, the nonlinear model provided better results in terms of various time parameters (Tr, Ty, Ts) and in error analysis (IAE, ITAE and ISE).
机译:基于过程模型的控制器的过程建模和设计是过程控制中的重要一步。在本研究中,以产品的输出浓度为控制参数,建立了CSTR的三种不同的数学模型,即非线性过程模型,线性化二阶模型和带停滞时间的一阶(FOPDT)模型。比例积分(PI)控制器是基于CSTR的二阶和FOPDT模型设计的,使用SIMC(Skogestad内部模型控制),Hagglund和Astrom以及具有5%超调的计算方法。在所有三种调整方法中,非线性模型在各种时间参数(T r ,T y ,T s )和误差分析(IAE,ITAE和ISE)方面提供了更好的结果)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号