首页> 外文期刊>Regional Studies, Regional Science >Understanding the poor economic performance of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India: a macro-perspective
【24h】

Understanding the poor economic performance of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India: a macro-perspective

机译:理解印度比哈尔邦和北方邦的不良经济表现:宏观观点

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper investigates the underlying causes of poor economic growth of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh (UP), India, despite being endowed with relatively rich natural resources. Against the conventional view, the analysis reveals that poor economic growth is not due to a particular factor but an outcome of a myriad of social, economic and political factors rooted in structural, historical and macro-economic policies. The economic marginalization of Bihar and UP began in the colonial era through the establishment of an exploitative landlord class, which constantly resisted economic and social development even after independence in 1947. The process of marginalization has further been reinforced by the federal central government’s policy of ‘freight equalization’, which nullified the comparative advantage of Bihar and UP in natural resources by subsidizing railway freights of industrial inputs like coal, iron ore, steel, cement and other bulk resources. This, combined with relatively low financial resources received from central government over the consecutive plan periods, has undermined these states’ capacity to invest in health, education, and other social and physical infrastructure and resulted in low human development. The poor performance of Bihar and UP may be attributed to low human capital, weak institutions and poor infrastructure coupled with political instability and social conflict rooted in sectarian politics based on caste, class and ethnic division.
机译:本文调查了印度比哈尔邦和北方邦(UP)尽管拥有相对丰富的自然资源,但经济增长不佳的根本原因。与传统观点相反,该分析表明,较差的经济增长不是由于特定因素造成的,而是源于结构,历史和宏观经济政策的众多社会,经济和政治因素的结果。比哈尔邦(Bihar)和UP(UP)的经济边缘化始于殖民时期,即建立了剥削性的地主阶级,该阶级甚至在1947年独立后就一直抵制经济和社会发展。联邦中央政府的“货运均等化”,通过补贴工业投入的铁路货运,如煤炭,铁矿石,钢铁,水泥和其他散装资源,抵消了比哈尔邦和UP在自然资源方面的比较优势。再加上在连续的计划期内从中央政府获得的相对较少的财政资源,削弱了这些州在卫生,教育以及其他社会和物质基础设施上的投资能力,并导致人类发展缓慢。比哈尔邦和UP的表现不佳,可能是由于人力资本低,机构薄弱,基础设施薄弱,加上政治不稳定和社会冲突根源于基于种姓,阶级和种族划分的宗派政治。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号