首页> 外文期刊>Reading & Writing >Towards a more explicit writing pedagogy: The complexity of teaching argumentative writing
【24h】

Towards a more explicit writing pedagogy: The complexity of teaching argumentative writing

机译:走向更明确的写作教学法:论证写作教学的复杂性

获取原文
       

摘要

Advances in technology, changes in communication practices, and the imperatives of the workplace have led to the repositioning of the role of writing in the global context. This has implications for the teaching of writing in schools. This article focuses on the argumentative essay, which is a high-stakes genre. A sample of work from one Grade 10 student identified as high performing in a township school in Cape Town (South Africa) is analysed. Drawing on the work of Ormerod and Ivanic, who argue that writing practices can be inferred from material artifacts, as well as critical discourse analysis, we show that the argumentative genre is complex, especially for novice first additional language English writers. This complexity is confounded by the conflation of the process and genre approaches in the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) document. Based on the analysis we discuss the implications of planning, particularly in relation to thinking and reasoning, the need to read in order to write argument and how social and school capital are insufficient without explicit instruction of the conventions of this complex genre. These findings present some insights into particular input needed to improve writing pedagogy for specific genres.
机译:技术的进步,交流方式的变化以及工作场所的必要性已导致在全球范围内重新定位写作的角色。这对学校的写作教学有影响。本文重点讨论具有争议性的论文,这是一种热门话题。对来自一名在南非开普敦的乡镇学校表现出色的10年级学生的工作样本进行了分析。利用Ormerod和Ivanic的著作(他们认为写作实践可以从物质制品以及批判性话语分析中得出),我们证明了论证体裁是复杂的,特别是对于新手入门的英语英语作家而言。课程和评估政策声明(CAPS)文档中流程和体裁方法的混合使这种复杂性感到困惑。在分析的基础上,我们讨论了计划的含义,特别是与思维和推理有关的内容,为撰写论点而需要阅读的内容以及在没有明确指示这一复杂类型惯例的情况下,社会和学校资本不足的原因。这些发现为改进特定类型的写作教学法所需的特殊输入提供了一些见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号