首页> 外文期刊>Literator >Conversation, characterisation and corpus linguistics: Dialogue in Jane Austen's Sense and Sensibility
【24h】

Conversation, characterisation and corpus linguistics: Dialogue in Jane Austen's Sense and Sensibility

机译:对话,表征和语料库语言学:简·奥斯丁理智与情感的对话

获取原文
       

摘要

This article reports on a corpus-based exploration of the role that fictional dialogue plays in characterisation. The focus is on the two main characters of Austen's Sense and Sensibility and (a) the extent to which certain features of their dialogue can be said to tie in with general perceptions that Elinor represents the “sense” and Marianne the “sensibility” of the novel's title; and (b) the extent to which Austen can be said to have exploited these features to enable the sisters to speak with subtly differing voices. The features themselves were drawn from two linguistic frameworks, namely cohesion in text linguistics (specifically, the category of conjunctive cohesion as originated by Halliday and Hasan (1976)), and the category of “involvement” in register analysis (most prominently, Biber 1988). The density of these features in each dialogue was calculated, compared statistically and salient differences considered in relation to the focal issues of the study. Although two of the five hypotheses formulated were not supported, the results overall provided strong indications that Austen successfully distinguishes between the sisters through their dialogue, and often in ways that link with less subtle, more explicit cues to their character that are given in the text. The study thus reveals how certain text-linguistic and register features can underpin characterisation in fiction, and in so doing explicates aspects of what it is that readers and literary critics respond to when they comment on characterisation in a novel.
机译:本文报告了基于语料库的虚构对话在表征中的作用。重点在于奥斯丁的理性和情感的两个主要特征,以及(a)可以说他们对话的某些特征在多大程度上与普遍的看法相联系,即埃里诺代表了“感觉”,玛丽安则代表了小说的标题; (b)可以说奥斯丁在多大程度上利用了这些特征,使姐妹们可以用微妙的不同声音说话。这些功能本身是从两个语言框架中得出的,即文本语言学中的内聚性(具体来说,由Halliday和Hasan(1976)提出的合取内聚性类别)和语种分析中的“参与”类别(最著名的是Biber 1988) )。计算每个对话中这些特征的密度,比较统计上的差异和与研究重点相关的显着差异。尽管不支持所提出的五个假设中的两个,但总体结果强烈表明,奥斯丁通过对话成功地区分了姐妹,并且通常以与文本中所含性格较不细微,更明确的暗示联系起来的方式。因此,这项研究揭示了某些文本语言和寄存器特征如何支撑小说中的表征,并以此阐明读者和文学评论家在评论小说中的表征时所做出的回应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号