首页> 外文期刊>New West Indian Guide >Colonial Citizens of a Modern Empire: War, Illiteracy, and Physical Education in Puerto Rico, 1917-1930
【24h】

Colonial Citizens of a Modern Empire: War, Illiteracy, and Physical Education in Puerto Rico, 1917-1930

机译:现代帝国的殖民公民:1917-1930年在波多黎各的战争,文盲和体育教育

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract The year 1917 marked a critical moment in the relationship between the United States and its Puerto Rican colony. It was the year the U.S. Congress approved the Jones Act, which further consolidated the island’s colonial relationship to the empire. Through the Jones Act, U.S. Congressmen granted Puerto Ricans U.S. citizenship. In turn, Puerto Rican men were asked to fulfill the obligations of their new colonial citizenship and join the U.S. military. The Porto Rican Regiment provided 18,000 colonial military recruits to guard the Panama Canal during the war. How did historical actors make sense of this new colonial citizenship? How did they interpret, debate, and adapt to the newly consolidated colonial status? This essay examines how local teachers and educators defined colonial citizenship. Puerto Rican teachers struggled to promote a citizenship-building project that cultivated student commitment to the patria (the island), while acknowledging the colonial relationship to the United States. In the late 1910s and throughout the 1920s, teachers debated military participation in World War I and the rights and obligations of U.S. citizenship. At the core, these debates were informed by anxieties over broader changes in constructions of gender. In the 1920s, Puerto Rico women aggressively and persistently challenged traditional gender norms. Working-class women joined the labor force in ever larger numbers and led labor strikes. Bourgeois women became teachers, nurses, and social workers. Both groups were committed suffragists. The historiography on citizenship and gender in the 1920s has focused on women’s emerging role in public spaces and their demands for just labor rights and the franchise. In this article, I propose we look at teachers, as intermediate actors in the colonial hierarchy, and examine their anxieties over changing gender norms. They debated men’s capacity to serve in the U.S. military and promoted modern physical education for the regeneration of boys and girls in the service of their patria. Debates among teachers in the 1920s sought to define the new category of colonial citizenship. As they did so, they helped liberalize some gender norms, while ultimately reinforcing patriarchy.
机译:摘要1917年是美国与其波多黎各殖民地之间关系的关键时刻。那一年,美国国会批准了《琼斯法》,进一步巩固了该岛与帝国的殖民关系。通过《琼斯法》,美国国会议员授予波多黎各人美国国籍。反过来,波多黎各人又被要求履行新殖民公民的义务,并加入美军。波多黎各军团在战争期间提供了18,000名殖民地军事新兵来保卫巴拿马运河。历史参与者如何理解这种新的殖民公民身份?他们如何解释,辩论和适应新近巩固的殖民地位?本文探讨了当地教师和教育者如何定义殖民公民身份。波多黎各人的教师努力推动一项公民建设项目,该项目培养了学生对爱国主义(岛屿)的承诺,同时承认与美国的殖民关系。在1910年代后期和整个1920年代,老师们对军事参与第一次世界大战以及美国公民的权利和义务进行了辩论。从根本上说,这些辩论是由于人们对性别结构的更广泛变化感到焦虑而引起的。在1920年代,波多黎各妇女不断挑战传统的性别规范。工人阶级的妇女加入劳动力大军,导致了罢工。资产阶级妇女成为教师,护士和社会工作者。两组都是坚定的选举权主义者。关于1920年代公民身份和性别的历史记录着重于妇女在公共场所中的新兴角色及其对劳工权利和特许经营权的要求。在本文中,我建议我们将教师视为殖民体系中的中间角色,并研究他们对不断变化的性别规范的焦虑。他们对男子在美军服役的能力进行了辩论,并促进了现代体育教育,以重生男孩和女孩,为他们的爱国主义服务。 1920年代的教师辩论试图界定殖民公民的新类别。通过这样做,他们帮助放宽了一些性别规范,同时最终加强了父权制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号