首页> 外文期刊>National Journal of Medical Research >Comparison of Early Management of Compound Grade 2 and 3A (Gustilo-Anderson) Fractures of Tibia Shaft using Primary Intramedullary Nailing and Placement of Antibiotic Bone-Cement Beads, with that of External Fixator Application
【24h】

Comparison of Early Management of Compound Grade 2 and 3A (Gustilo-Anderson) Fractures of Tibia Shaft using Primary Intramedullary Nailing and Placement of Antibiotic Bone-Cement Beads, with that of External Fixator Application

机译:初步应用髓内钉固定和抗生素骨水泥微珠放置胫骨干复合2级和3A级(古斯蒂洛-安德森)胫骨骨折的早期处理以及应用外固定架的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction: Compound fractures of tibia have been conventionally managed by debridement and external fixation, followed by intra medullary nailing or Ilizarov technique after few months. Definitive surgery is delayed in the early stages, as it may cause infections and additional soft tissue damage. But external fixators have their own set of complications. Hence a technique of antibiotic coated intramedullary nail (locked or unlocked) has been advocated. Methodology: Total 30 patients with grade 2 & 3 A (Gustilo-Anderson) compound tibia fractures were selected for the study. Group 1 was operated with antibiotic coated intramedullary nails. Group 2 was operated with external fixators application and later with intra medullary nailing. Results: The infection rate after nailing was 6.67% in group 1 (1out of 15) and 40% (6 out of 15) in group 2 (p=0.02 i.e. statistically significant).The timing to healing (cortical bridging) was 4.5 months (2 - 8.5months) in group 1 and 7.5 (3-18) months in group 2. (p=0.02i.e. statistically significant).The overall complication rate was 60% (9/15 cases) for group 2 and 26.67% (4/15 cases) for group 1 (p=0.03 i.e. statistically significant).Results of primary nailing with antibiotic impregnated cement are superior to delayed nailing after initial external fixation. Conclusion: Primary nailing with antibiotic impregnated cement method is biologically active with greater advantages compared with existing methods of treatment in grade 2 & 3A compound tibia fractures. Clinical results are better with a lower infection rate and a less hospital stay.
机译:简介:胫骨复合骨折通常通过清创术和外固定治疗,几个月后再进行髓内钉或Ilizarov技术治疗。确定性手术在早期阶段会延迟,因为它可能导致感染和其他软组织损伤。但是外固定器有其自身的复杂性。因此,已提倡使用抗生素涂覆的髓内钉(锁定或解锁)技术。方法:选择了总共30例2级和3级A(Gustilo-Anderson)复合胫骨骨折患者。第一组使用抗生素涂层的髓内钉进行手术。第2组使用外固定器,随后进行髓内钉手术。结果:第1组的钉子感染率为6.67%(15个中的1个)和第2组的40%(15个中的6个)(p = 0.02,具有统计学意义)。愈合时间(皮质桥接)为4.5个月第1组(2-8.5个月)和第2组7.5(3-18)个月。(p = 0.02,即具有统计学意义)。第2组的总并发症发生率为60%(9/15例),占26.67%(第1组为4/15例(p = 0.03,即具有统计学意义)。初次外固定后,使用抗生素浸润的水泥进行的初次钉扎效果优于延迟钉扎。结论:与现有的2级和3A级复合胫骨骨折治疗方法相比,抗生素浸渍水泥法进行的初步钉扎具有生物活性,具有更大的优势。较低的感染率和更少的住院时间,临床效果更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号