首页> 外文期刊>Minpaku Anthropology Newsletter >Looking Back at my ZhuangResearch
【24h】

Looking Back at my ZhuangResearch

机译:回顾我的壮族研究

获取原文
       

摘要

The following introduces research and exhibitions I have been involved with during my time at Minpaku, from 1988 to 2017. My paper on ‘Trends and problems in studies of Nong Zhigao, a Zhuang (ethnic hero)’ was published in the Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology 40 in January 2016. In the paper, I critically reviewed how Nong Zhigao [ 儂智高 ] has been studied, particularly in China, from the establishment of the People’s Republic of China to the present day. In addition, I presented analyses of problems that have never been studied. To put it simply, the rebellion by Nong Zhigao has been interpreted differently according to the changing times. From the 1950s to the 1960s, whether the society in question was in a state of slavery or feudalism, and what rebellion accorded or not in relation to the former question, was debated on the basis of Marxist Developmental Theory. After the Sino-Vietnamese War of 1979, however, the debate shifted to a specific examination of the issue of his nationality. After the 1980s, as policies of reform and openness were developing, the paradigm of Nong Zhigao debate changed gradually. By the late 1990s, his evaluation as an ‘ethnic hero’ became established. The view of Nong Zhigao as a patriot who was poisoned, and his rebellion as a patriotic war strengthened against the backdrop of a groundswell in patriotism. During the first decade of the 2000s, as the internet has become increasing popular, many intellectuals and ordinary people, aside from professional researchers, have broadened the base of studies.
机译:以下介绍我从1988年至2017年在Minpaku期间参与的研究和展览。我的论文《壮族农志高研究的趋势和问题》发表在《国家通报》上。 2016年1月,人类学博物馆40。在这篇论文中,我批评性地回顾了从中华人民共和国成立到今天,如何研究Nong Zhigao(农智高),特别是在中国。此外,我还介绍了从未研究过的问题的分析。简而言之,农志高的叛乱根据时代的变迁得到了不同的解释。从1950年代到1960年代,所讨论的社会是处于奴隶制还是封建主义状态,以及与前一个问题相关的叛乱是基于马克思主义发展理论进行的。但是,在1979年的中越战争之后,辩论转向了对他的国籍问题的具体审查。 1980年代后,随着改革开放政策的发展,农志高辩论的范式逐渐改变。到1990年代后期,他成为“民族英雄”的评价开始确立。在爱国主义风潮汹涌的大背景下,农智高被视为被毒死的爱国者,而他的叛逆运动也被视为爱国战争。在2000年代的前十年中,随着互联网变得越来越流行,除专业研究人员外,许多知识分子和普通百姓也拓宽了研究基础。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号