首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:去甲肾上腺素与去氧肾上腺素在剖宫产并麻醉下控制麻醉的母体低血压的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Phenylephrine is the current “gold standard" vasopressor used to treat maternal hypotension in women undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia. Since 2015, various studies have explored the use of norepinephrine to manage maternal hypotension. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for the prevention and treatment of maternal hypotension. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase (Embase.com), and the Cochrane CENTRAL register of controlled trials. Parturients underwent cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia and received norepinephrine to prevent or treat hypotension were considered. Maternal outcomes, including incidences of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV), maternal cardiac output (CO), and blood pressure (BP) control precision, as well as neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical cord blood analyses, were compared between groups. Results: Three RCTs in 4 reports published between 2015 and 2018 were finally identified with a total of 294 parturients. We found there was no difference in effectiveness between norepinephrine and phenylephrine for the treatment of maternal hypotension (odds ratio [OR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–1.10, P = .11), and there was no difference in the occurrence of hypertension (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.33–1.62, P = .45). Of note, compared to the phenylephrine group, parturients in the norepinephrine group were less likely to experience bradycardia (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.12–0.68, P = .005) and IONV (OR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29–0.99, P = .04). Further, we did not observe a difference between the two vasopressors in the incidence of neonatal Apgar scores 7 at 1 and 5 minutes or in umbilical vein (UV) blood gas. However, evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions regarding the greater maternal CO and better BP control precision with the use of norepinephrine . Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis shows norepinephrine provides similar efficacy to manage maternal hypotension compared to phenylephrine ; additionally, showing advantage regarding certain side effects like bradycardia and IONV reduction. Accordingly, norepinephrine is a promising alternative to phenylephrine . However, before routine clinical application, more studies are warranted.
机译:背景:苯肾上腺素是目前用于治疗剖宫产并进行脊髓麻醉的妇女的母亲低血压的现行“金标准”升压药,自2015年以来,各种研究探索了使用去甲肾上腺素治疗母亲低血压的方法,我们进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析方法:使用电子数据库,包括PubMed,MEDLINE,Embase(Embase.com)进行系统的文献检索,比较现有的随机对照试验(RCT),以比较去甲肾上腺素和去氧肾上腺素对预防和治疗母体低血压的有效性和安全性。 ,并考虑了Cochrane CENTRAL对照试验登记的产妇在接受剖腹分娩的同时进行了脊髓麻醉并接受去甲肾上腺素以预防或治疗低血压,并考虑了孕产妇预后,包括低血压,高血压,心动过缓,术中恶心和呕吐(IONV)的发生,孕产妇心脏cardiac输出(CO)和血压(在两组之间比较了BP)控制精度,以及新生儿Apgar评分和脐带血分析。结果:最终确定了2015年至2018年之间发布的4份报告中的3项RCT,共有294名产妇。我们发现去甲肾上腺素和去氧肾上腺素在治疗孕产妇低血压方面的疗效没有差异(几率[OR] 0.64; 95%置信区间[CI] 0.37–1.10,P = .11),并且两者之间没有差异。发生高血压(OR 0.74; 95%CI 0.33-1.62,P = 0.45)。值得注意的是,与去氧肾上腺素组相比,去甲肾上腺素组的产妇发生心动过缓(OR 0.29; 95%CI 0.12-0.68,P = .005)和IONV(OR 0.54; 95%CI,0.29-0.99), P = .04)。此外,我们没有观察到两种升压药之间在1分钟和5分钟或脐静脉(UV)血气中新生儿Apgar得分<7的发生率之间存在差异。然而,证据不足以得出结论,去甲肾上腺素的使用可提高母亲的产气量和血压控制的准确性。结论:这项系统的回顾和荟萃分析显示,去甲肾上腺素与去氧肾上腺素相比在控制孕产妇低血压方面具有相似的疗效;此外,在某些副作用如心动过缓和IONV降低方面显示出优势。因此,去甲肾上腺素是苯肾上腺素的有前途的替代品。但是,在常规临床应用之前,需要进行更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号