首页> 外文期刊>Genus >Comparing strategies for matching mortality forecasts to the most recently observed data: exploring the trade-off between accuracy and robustness
【24h】

Comparing strategies for matching mortality forecasts to the most recently observed data: exploring the trade-off between accuracy and robustness

机译:比较将死亡率预测与最近观察到的数据相匹配的策略:探索准确性与鲁棒性之间的权衡

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract BackgroundGiven the increased link between retirement age and payments to the development in life expectancy, a precise and regular forecast of life expectancy is of utmost importance. The choice of the jump-off rates, i.e. the rates in the last year of the fitting period, is essential for matching mortality forecasts to the most recently observed data. A general approach to the choice of the jump-off rates is currently lacking.ObjectiveWe evaluate six different options for the jump-off rates and examine their effects on the robustness and accuracy of the mortality forecast.Data and methodsDeath and exposure numbers by age for eight European countries over the years 1960–2014 were obtained from the Human Mortality Database. We examined the use of model values as jump-off rates versus observed values in the last year or averaged over the last couple of years. The future life expectancy at age 65 is calculated for different fitting periods and jump-off rates using the Lee-Carter model and examined on accuracy (mean absolute forecast error) and robustness (standard deviation of the change in projected e65).ResultsThe choice for the jump-off rates clearly influences the accuracy and robustness of the mortality forecast, albeit in different ways. For most countries using the last observed values as jump-off rates resulted in the most accurate method, which relates to the relatively high estimation error of the model in recent years. The most robust method is obtained by using an average of observed years as jump-off rates. The more years that are averaged, the better the robustness, but accuracy decreases with more years averaged.ConclusionCarefully considering the best choice for the jump-off rates is essential when forecasting mortality. The best strategy for matching mortality forecasts to the most recently observed data depends on the goal of the forecast, the country-specific past mortality trends observed, and the model fit.
机译:摘要背景:鉴于退休年龄与薪酬与预期寿命发展之间的联系越来越紧密,准确而定期地预测预期寿命至关重要。要使死亡率预测与最近观察到的数据相匹配,选择跳高率(即拟合期最后一年的速率)至关重要。目前尚缺乏选择跳变率的通用方法。目的我们评估跳变率的六种不同选择,并检验其对死亡率预测的稳健性和准确性的影响数据和方法从人类死亡率数据库中获得了1960-2014年间的八个欧洲国家。我们检查了使用模型值作为跳闸率与去年的观测值或过去几年的平均值的比较。使用Lee-Carter模型针对不同的拟合期和跳高率计算65岁时的预期寿命,并检查其准确性(平均绝对预测误差)和稳健性(预计e65变化的标准偏差)。跳升率显然会以不同的方式影响死亡率预测的准确性和稳健性。对于大多数使用最近观测值作为跳变率的国家,得出的方法最准确,这与近年来该模型的较高估计误差有关。最可靠的方法是将观测到的年平均值作为跳出率。平均年限越长,鲁棒性越好,但平均年限越长,准确性会下降。结论在预测死亡率时,仔细考虑跳变率的最佳选择至关重要。使死亡率预测与最近观察到的数据相匹配的最佳策略取决于预测的目标,所观察到的特定国家/地区过去的死亡率趋势以及模型拟合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号