首页> 外文期刊>Genus >Multidimensional poverty, household environment and short-term morbidity in India
【24h】

Multidimensional poverty, household environment and short-term morbidity in India

机译:印度的多维贫困,家庭环境和短期发病率

获取原文
       

摘要

Using the unit data from the second round of the Indian Human Development Survey (IHDS-II), 2011–2012, which covered 42,152 households, this paper examines the association between multidimensional poverty, household environmental deprivation and short-term morbidities (fever, cough and diarrhoea) in India. Poverty is measured in a multidimensional framework that includes the dimensions of education, health and income, while household environmental deprivation is defined as lack of access to improved sanitation, drinking water and cooking fuel. A composite index combining multidimensional poverty and household environmental deprivation has been computed, and households are classified as follows: multidimensional poor and living in a poor household environment, multidimensional non-poor and living in a poor household environment, multidimensional poor and living in a good household environment and multidimensional non-poor and living in a good household environment.Results suggest that about 23% of the population belonging to multidimensional poor households and living in a poor household environment had experienced short-term morbidities in a reference period of 30?days compared to 20% of the population belonging to multidimensional non-poor households and living in a poor household environment, 19% of the population belonging to multidimensional poor households and living in a good household environment and 15% of the population belonging to multidimensional non-poor households and living in a good household environment. Controlling for socioeconomic covariates, the odds of short-term morbidity was 1.47 [CI 1.40–1.53] among the multidimensional poor and living in a poor household environment, 1.28 [CI 1.21–1.37] among the multidimensional non-poor and living in a poor household environment and 1.21 [CI 1.64–1.28] among the multidimensional poor and living in a good household environment compared to the multidimensional non-poor and living in a good household environment. Results are robust across states and hold good for each of the three morbidities: fever, cough and diarrhoea. This establishes that along with poverty, household environmental conditions have a significant bearing on short-term morbidities in India. Public investment in sanitation, drinking water and cooking fuel can reduce the morbidity and improve the health of the population.
机译:本文使用2011-2012年第二轮印度人类发展调查(IHDS-II)的单位数据,涵盖42,152个家庭,研究了多维贫困,家庭环境剥夺与短期发病(发热,咳嗽)之间的关系。和腹泻)。贫困是在一个多维框架内衡量的,该框架包括教育,健康和收入等各个方面,而家庭环境匮乏的定义是无法获得改善的卫生条件,饮用水和烹饪燃料。已计算出将多维贫困与家庭环境剥夺相结合的综合指数,家庭分类如下:多维贫困人口和生活在贫困家庭环境中,多维非贫困人口和生活在贫困家庭环境中,多维贫困人口和生活在良好环境中家庭环境和多维非贫困人口并生活在一个良好的家庭环境中。结果表明,大约30%的多维贫困家庭和生活在贫困家庭环境中的人口在30天的参考期内经历了短期发病相比之下,属于多维非贫困家庭并生活在贫困家庭环境中的人口比例为20%,属于多维贫困家庭并生活在良好家庭环境中的人口比例为19%,属于多维非贫困家庭的人口比例为15%贫困家庭,生活在良好的家庭环境中。控制社会经济协变量,多维贫困者和贫困家庭环境中短期发病的几率为1.47 [CI 1.40–1.53],非多维贫困人口和贫困家庭中1.28 [CI 1.21–1.37]家庭环境; 1.21 [CI 1.64–1.28]在多维贫困人口中生活在一个良好的家庭环境中,而多维非贫困人口生活在一个良好的家庭环境中。各州的结果都很可靠,并且对以下三种疾病中的每一种都有好处:发烧,咳嗽和腹泻。这表明,与贫困一起,家庭环境状况对印度的短期发病也有重要影响。对卫生,饮用水和食用燃料的公共投资可以减少发病率并改善人们的健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号