首页> 外文期刊>In die Skriflig >Luther and Calvin on predestination: A comparison
【24h】

Luther and Calvin on predestination: A comparison

机译:路德和加尔文的预定论:比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Alexander Schweizer propagated the thesis that predestination is a central theme of Calvin’s theology and that later Calvinism had to defend his teaching as the distinguishing point between the Lutheran and reformed traditions. In this article it is shown that election is also an important element of Luther’s theology. The historic development of the two reformers’ thinking about election is presented. In spite of different nuances, the difference between the two are minimal. The main reason why the differences could be underplayed is because it is shown that Calvin’s thesis of ‘double predestination’ only forms one part of Calvin’s doctrinal thinking on this subject. Calvin has actually two sets of statements on predestination. When the unacceptable statements about ‘double predestination’ are not emphasised, but rather his early works and sermons, he and Luther share the same opinions on election in Christ through grace. Both of them understand election as the final word on justification.
机译:亚历山大·史威哲(Alexander Schweizer)传播了这样一个论点,即宿命论是加尔文神学的中心主题,后来加尔文主义必须捍卫他的教义,将其作为路德宗与改良传统之间的区别。在本文中,表明选举也是路德神学的重要组成部分。介绍了两个改革者关于选举的思想的历史发展。尽管存在细微差别,但两者之间的差异很小。差异可能被低估的主要原因是因为,这表明加尔文的“双重预定权”论点仅构成加尔文关于该主题的理论思想的一部分。卡尔文实际上有两套关于预定目的的陈述。当不强调关于“双宿命”不可接受的陈述,而是他的早期作品和说教,他和路德通过恩典分享选举相同意见在基督里。他们俩都将选举理解为理由的最终决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号