首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety >Fatty acids profile and quality characteristics of broiler chicken meat fed different dietary oil sources with some additives
【24h】

Fatty acids profile and quality characteristics of broiler chicken meat fed different dietary oil sources with some additives

机译:饲喂不同日粮油源的鸡肉的脂肪酸组成和品质特性。

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The study was carried out to investigate the effect of feeding broiler chicken on different vegetable oils with feed additives on the quality characteristics of chicken meat. A total of 216 one-day-old chicks of ( Hubbard ) strain were randomly assigned to six dietary treatments as (2×3) factorial designs where two sources of dietary oil with three levels of commercial multi-enzyme feed additives. Treatments were: soybean oil only (T1), soybean oil+ ZAD (T2), soybean oil+ AmPhi-BACT (T3), palm oil only (T4), palm oil + ZAD (T5) and palm oil + AmPhi- BACT (T6). Results showed that feeding broiler chicken on different types of dietary oils had significant effect on the fatty acid profile of broiler chicken meat. UFA/SFA ration of broiler chicken groups (T4, T5adT6) were significantly lower compared with (T1, T2 and T3) groups. Broiler fed on soybean oil had significantly higher n-6: n-3 ration compared with broiler fed on palm oil. Regardless of the source of dietary oil, significant differences were observed in the most of fatty acid profile in the chicken meat among levels of commercial multi- enzyme feed additives. Meat of T5and T6 had the higher pH value, followed by meat of T1and T3 groups, while the lowest pH value found in meat of T2 and T4. The higher cooking loss was found in meat of T4 while, meat of T5had the lowest value. Data of chilling loss indicated that the differences between dietary treatments were not significantly different except for meat of T6 which had the higher chilling loss. No significant differences were found in color measurements between dietary treatments.
机译:这项研究旨在研究在饲料中添加不同饲料添加剂的不同植物油对肉鸡的影响。总共216只(哈伯德)品系的1日龄雏鸡被随机分配为6种日粮处理方法,作为(2×3)因子设计,其中两种来源的食用油和三种水平的商业多酶饲料添加剂。处理方法为:仅豆油(T1),豆油+ ZAD(T2),豆油+ AmPhi-BACT(T3),仅棕榈油(T4),棕榈油+ ZAD(T5)和棕榈油+ AmPhi-BACT(T6) 。结果表明,在不同类型的日粮油中饲喂肉鸡对肉鸡的脂肪酸谱有显着影响。与(T1,T2和T3)组相比,肉鸡组(T4,T5adT6)的UFA / SFA比率显着降低。与以棕榈油为食的肉鸡相比,以大豆油为食的肉鸡的n-6:n-3比例高得多。不管膳食油的来源如何,在商用多酶饲料添加剂的含量之间,在鸡肉中的大多数脂肪酸谱中都观察到了显着差异。 T5和T6的肉的pH值较高,其次是T1和T3的肉,而T2和T4的肉的pH值最低。 T4的肉的蒸煮损失较高,而T5的肉的蒸煮损失最低。冷藏损失数据表明,饮食处理之间的差异没有显着差异,除了T6的肉具有较高的冷藏损失。饮食治疗之间的颜色测量没有发现显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号