首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >Attitude of resident doctors towards intensive care units’ alarm settings
【24h】

Attitude of resident doctors towards intensive care units’ alarm settings

机译:住院医生对重症监护室警报设置的态度

获取原文
       

摘要

Intensive care unit (ICU) monitors have alarm options to intimate the staff of critical incidents but these alarms needs to be adjusted in every patient. With this objective in mind, this study was done among resident doctors, with the aim of assessing the existing attitude among resident doctors towards ICU alarm settings. This study was conducted among residents working at ICU of a multispeciality centre, with the help of a printed questionnaire. The study involved 80 residents. All residents were in full agreement on routine use of ECG, pulse oximeter, capnograph and NIBP monitoring. 86% residents realised the necessity of monitoring oxygen concentration, apnoea monitoring and expired minute ventilation monitoring. 87% PGs and 70% SRs routinely checked alarm limits for various parameters. 50% PGs and 46.6% SRs set these alarm limits. The initial response to an alarm among all the residents was to disable the alarm temporarily and try to look for a cause. 92% of PGs and 98% of SRs were aware of alarms priority and colour coding. 55% residents believed that the alarm occurred due to patient disturbance, 15% believed that alarm was due to technical problem with monitor/sensor and 30% thought it was truly related to patient’s clinical status. 82% residents set the alarms by themselves, 10% believed that alarms should be adjusted by nurse, 4% believed the technical staff should take responsibility of setting alarm limits and 4% believed that alarm levels should be pre-adjusted by the manufacturer. We conclude that although alarms are an important, indispensable, and lifesaving feature, they can be a nuisance and can compromise quality and safety of care by frequent false positive alarms. We should be familiar of the alarm modes, check and reset the alarm settings at regular interval or after a change in clinical status of the patient.Keywords: Adjustment, alarms, critical care, intensive care units
机译:重症监护病房(ICU)监护仪具有警报选项,可以使工作人员了解重大事件,但是需要针对每位患者进行调整。考虑到这一目标,本研究是在住院医生中进行的,目的是评估住院医生对ICU警报设置的现有态度。这项研究是在多专业中心的ICU中工作的居民中进行的,其方式为印刷问卷。该研究涉及80名居民。所有居民都完全同意常规使用心电图,脉搏血氧仪,二氧化碳图和无创血压监测。 86%的居民意识到有必要监测氧气浓度,监测呼吸暂停和监测过期的通气量。 87%PG和70%SR常规检查各种参数的警报限值。这些警报限制由50%PG和46.6%SR设置。所有居民对警报的最初反应是暂时禁用警报并尝试寻找原因。 92%的PG和98%的SR知道警报优先级和颜色编码。 55%的居民认为该警报是由于患者的干扰引起的,15%的居民认为该警报是由于监护仪/传感器的技术问题引起的,还有30%的居民认为这与患者的临床状况确实相关。 82%的居民自行设置警报,10%的人认为警报应由护士调整,4%的人认为技术人员应负责设置警报极限,4%的人认为警报水平应由制造商预先调整。我们得出的结论是,尽管警报是重要的,必不可少的并且可以挽救生命的功能,但它们可能会造成滋扰,并且由于频繁出现误报警报,会损害护理的质量和安全性。我们应该熟悉警报模式,定期或在患者临床状态改变后检查并重置警报设置。关键词:调整,警报,重症监护,重症监护室

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号