首页> 外文期刊>Innovation in aging. >CUSTODIAL KNOWLEDGE AND LEGAL PERCEPTION AMONG GRANDPARENTS RAISING THEIR GRANDCHILDREN
【24h】

CUSTODIAL KNOWLEDGE AND LEGAL PERCEPTION AMONG GRANDPARENTS RAISING THEIR GRANDCHILDREN

机译:抚养孙子女的祖父母中的习俗知识和法律观念

获取原文
       

摘要

The current study examines the ways in which grandparents raising their grandchildren (GRCs) understand custody, perceive the legal system, and access resources related to their grandchild(ren)’s welfare. Due to the detrimental impact of the opioid crisis over the last decade, the number of skipped generation households is growing significantly not only in Alabama, but across the U.S.. Many GRCs lack crucial information regarding custody arrangements in a general sense or as it applies to education, healthcare, mental health, and financial aid. Critical gaps remain present in the GRC literature necessary to aid in future intervention studies and promote more effective support, resources, and policy for this population. The present study sought to examine the unique needs and experiences of GRCs, and to specifically explore legal aspects associated to their grandchild(ren)’s welfare. Using a mixed methods approach, GRCs in Tuscaloosa, Alabama completed a quiz of custodial knowledge, a survey on legal perception, and a semi-structured interview. Quantitative data revealed the most and least commonly understood aspects of custody, as well as opinions on associated legal systems related to a child’s “best interest.” Qualitative data analysis revealed the common themes related to custody to be unexpected assistance, ineffective assistance, leniency for parental deviance, fear of losing custody, and time and cost demands.
机译:当前的研究调查了抚养孙子孙辈(GRC)的祖父母如何理解监护权,理解法律制度以及获取与孙子孙辈福利相关的资源的方式。由于过去十年来阿片类药物危机的不利影响,逃亡家庭的数量不仅在阿拉巴马州而且在整个美国都在显着增长,许多GRC缺乏关于一般意义上或适用于监护权安排的重要信息。教育,医疗保健,心理健康和经济援助。 GRC文献中仍然存在关键差距,这些差距对于协助将来的干预研究并促进对该人群的更有效的支持,资源和政策而言是必要的。本研究旨在研究GRC的独特需求和经验,并特别探讨与他们的孙子女福利有关的法律方面。通过使用混合方法,位于阿拉巴马州塔斯卡卢萨(Tuscaloosa)的GRCs完成了保管知识测验,法律观念调查和半结构化访谈。定量数据揭示了监护方面最普遍和最不被普遍理解的方面,以及与儿童“最大利益”相关的相关法律制度的观点。定性数据分析显示,与监护有关的共同主题是意外的帮助,无效的帮助,宽恕父母的偏见,担心失去监护权以及时间和成本要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号