首页> 外文期刊>Atmosphere >Effects of Boundary Layer Height on the Model of Ground-Level PM 2.5 Concentrations from AOD: Comparison of Stable and Convective Boundary Layer Heights from Different Methods
【24h】

Effects of Boundary Layer Height on the Model of Ground-Level PM 2.5 Concentrations from AOD: Comparison of Stable and Convective Boundary Layer Heights from Different Methods

机译:边界层高度对AOD地面PM 2.5浓度模型的影响:不同方法的稳定边界层和对流边界层高度的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

The aerosol optical depth (AOD) from satellites or ground-based sun photometer spectral observations has been widely used to estimate ground-level PM 2.5 concentrations by regression methods. The boundary layer height (BLH) is a popular factor in the regression model of AOD and PM 2.5 , but its effect is often uncertain. This may result from the structures between the stable and convective BLHs and from the calculation methods of the BLH. In this study, the boundary layer is divided into two types of stable and convective boundary layer, and the BLH is calculated using different methods from radiosonde data and National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis data for the station in Beijing, China during 2014–2015. The BLH values from these methods show significant differences for both the stable and convective boundary layer. Then, these BLHs were introduced into the regression model of AOD-PM 2.5 to seek the respective optimal BLH for the two types of boundary layer. It was found that the optimal BLH for the stable boundary layer is determined using the method of surface-based inversion, and the optimal BLH for the convective layer is determined using the method of elevated inversion. Finally, the optimal BLH and other meteorological parameters were combined to predict the PM 2.5 concentrations using the stepwise regression method. The results indicate that for the stable boundary layer, the optimal stepwise regression model includes the factors of surface relative humidity, BLH, and surface temperature. These three factors can significantly enhance the prediction accuracy of ground-level PM 2.5 concentrations, with an increase of determination coefficient from 0.50 to 0.68. For the convective boundary layer, however, the optimal stepwise regression model includes the factors of BLH and surface wind speed. These two factors improve the determination coefficient, with a relatively low increase from 0.65 to 0.70. It is found that the regression coefficients of the BLH are positive and negative in the stable and convective regression models, respectively. Moreover, the effects of meteorological factors are indeed related to the types of BLHs.
机译:来自卫星或地面太阳光度计光谱观测的气溶胶光学深度(AOD)已被广泛用于通过回归方法估算地面PM 2.5浓度。在AOD和PM 2.5的回归模型中,边界层高度(BLH)是一个受欢迎的因素,但其影响通常不确定。这可能是由于稳定BLH和对流BLH之间的结构以及BLH的计算方法引起的。在本研究中,边界层分为稳定和对流边界层两种类型,BLH是使用无线电探空仪数据和2014年中国北京站的国家环境预测中心(NCEP)再分析数据中的不同方法来计算的–2015年。这些方法的BLH值对于稳定边界层和对流边界层均显示出显着差异。然后,将这些BLH引入AOD-PM 2.5的回归模型中,以针对两种边界层分别寻找最佳BLH。结果发现,采用基于表面的反演方法确定了稳定边界层的最佳BLH,采用升高的反演方法确定了对流层的最佳BLH。最后,使用逐步回归方法将最佳的BLH和其他气象参数结合起来,以预测PM 2.5浓度。结果表明,对于稳定的边界层,最佳的逐步回归模型包括表面相对湿度,BLH和表面温度等因素。这三个因素可以显着提高地面PM 2.5浓度的预测准确性,测定系数从0.50增加到0.68。但是,对于对流边界层,最佳逐步回归模型包括BLH和地表风速的因素。这两个因素提高了确定系数,从0.65到0.70的增加相对较低。发现在稳定和对流回归模型中,BLH的回归系数分别为正和负。此外,气象因素的影响确实与BLH的类型有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号